These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

812 related items for PubMed ID: 6478067

  • 21. The use of empathy in forensic examinations.
    Shuman DW.
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(3 and 4):289-302. PubMed ID: 11659813
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Forensic psychiatric testimony under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
    Slovenko R.
    Leg Med; 1995; ():241-60. PubMed ID: 8788672
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Prearraignment forensic evaluation: the odyssey moves east of the Pecos.
    Miller RD.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(3):311-21. PubMed ID: 2245246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Professional versus personal ethics: methods for system reform?
    Miller RD.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(2):163-77. PubMed ID: 1633337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The forensic psychiatrist: consultant versus activist in legal doctrine.
    Diamond BL.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(2):119-32. PubMed ID: 1633333
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Forensic psychiatry: the need for self-regulation.
    Appelbaum PS.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 1633336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Legal outcome and clinical findings: a study of insanity evaluations.
    Rogers R, Cavanaugh JL, Seman W, Harris M.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 6713107
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law.
    Gutheil TG, Mills MJ.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Ethical dilemmas in forensic evaluations.
    Rogers R.
    Behav Sci Law; 1987; 5(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 11650773
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. "Reasonable medical certainty": can we meet Daubert standards in insanity cases?
    Poythress NG.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 15515909
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Insanity defense in criminal trials and limitation of psychiatric testimony. Report of the Board of Trustees.
    JAMA; 1984 Jun 08; 251(22):2967-81. PubMed ID: 6716625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The meaning of mental illness in criminal responsibility.
    Slovenko R.
    J Leg Med; 1984 Mar 08; 5(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 6373991
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The role of the psychiatrist in the criminal justice system.
    Bazelon DL.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1978 Mar 08; 6(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 708910
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 41.