These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


210 related items for PubMed ID: 6511683

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sow productivity comparisons for four breeds of swine: purebred and crossbred litters.
    Gaugler HR, Buchanan DS, Hintz RL, Johnson RK.
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Oct; 59(4):941-7. PubMed ID: 6542563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparisons of specific crosses from Yorkshire-Landrace, Chester White-Landrace and Chester White-Yorkshire sows.
    Kuhlers DL, Jungst SB, Moore RA.
    J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1132-8. PubMed ID: 3397340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of Duroc, Meishan, Fengjing, and Minzhu boars on productivity of mates and growth of first-cross progeny.
    Young LD.
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2020-9. PubMed ID: 1644674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Examination of the relationship between the estrogen receptor gene and reproductive traits in swine.
    Isler BJ, Irvin KM, Neal SM, Moeller SJ, Davis ME.
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2334-9. PubMed ID: 12350010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of three-breed and backcross swine for litter productivity and postweaning performance.
    Wilson ER, Johnson RK.
    J Anim Sci; 1981 Jan; 52(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 7240036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Duroc boars have lower progeny mortality and lower fertility than Pietrain boars.
    Pedersen MLM, Velander IH, Nielsen MBF, Lundeheim N, Nielsen B.
    Transl Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 3(2):885-892. PubMed ID: 32704853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An embryo transfer study of reciprocal cross differences in growth and carcass traits of Duroc and Landrace pigs.
    Wilken TM, Lo LL, McLaren DG, Fernando RL, Dziuk PJ.
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2349-58. PubMed ID: 1506298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Performance of Duroc and Yorkshire boars and gilts and reciprocal breed crosses.
    Bereskin B, Steele NC.
    J Anim Sci; 1986 Apr; 62(4):918-26. PubMed ID: 3710933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the NE Index line. II. Growth and carcass responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB, Holl JW, Johnson RK.
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):1895-902. PubMed ID: 15309934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reciprocal recurrent selection for 21-day litter weight of crossbred gilts. I. Selection applied and genetic change in reproduction of crossbred gilts.
    Young LD, Omtvedt IT, Whatley JA, Johnson RK.
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Dec; 57(6):1418-30. PubMed ID: 6674282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.