These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

128 related items for PubMed ID: 6530321

  • 1. The Fitness to stand trial Interview Test: how four professions rate videotaped fitness interviews.
    Roesch R, Jackson MA, Sollner R, Eaves D, Glackman W, Webster CD.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1984; 7(2):115-31. PubMed ID: 6530321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reliability, validity and utility of the Fitness Interview Test.
    McDonald DA, Nussbaum DS, Bagby RM.
    Can J Psychiatry; 1991 Sep; 36(7):480-4. PubMed ID: 1933756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The nature and consequences of forensic psychiatric decision-making.
    Menzies RJ, Jackson MA, Glasberg RE.
    Can J Psychiatry; 1982 Oct; 27(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 7139519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Judgment of legal insanity as a function of attitude toward the insanity defense.
    Homant RJ, Kennedy DB.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986 Oct; 8(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 3940166
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Georgia Court Competency Test: the base-rate problem.
    Wildman RW, White PA, Brandenburg CE.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):1055-8. PubMed ID: 2377402
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessing fitness to stand trial: the utility of the Fitness Interview Test (revised edition).
    Zapf PA, Roesch R, Viljoen JL.
    Can J Psychiatry; 2001 Jun; 46(5):426-32. PubMed ID: 11441782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013 Jun; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Psychiatric, psychological, and legal models of man.
    Eastman N.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992 Jun; 15(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 1587651
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Ethical problems of insanity].
    Rutkowski R, Sobkowiak J.
    Psychiatr Pol; 1991 Jun; 25(3-4):119-24. PubMed ID: 1821971
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D, Janofsky J, Keram E, Lawsky S, Merideth P, Mossman D, Schwart-Watts D, Scott C, Thompson J, Zonana H, American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002 Jun; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Validation of a brief form of the Competency Screening Test.
    Nicholson RA.
    J Clin Psychol; 1988 Jan; 44(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 3343371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Rationality and flexibility in assessment of fitness to stand trial.
    Freckelton I.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1996 Jan; 19(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 8929658
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.