These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

168 related items for PubMed ID: 6545472

  • 1. Factors affecting the choice of nonpermanent contraceptive methods among married women.
    MacDowell M, Lee ES.
    Soc Biol; 1984; 31(3-4):222-31. PubMed ID: 6545472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Contraceptive failure in the United States: the impact of social economic and demographic factors (author's transl)].
    Schirm AL, Trussell J, Menken J, Grady WR.
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Apr; 11(4):659-73. PubMed ID: 12338614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-1995.
    Piccinino LJ, Mosher WD.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998 Apr; 30(1):4-10, 46. PubMed ID: 9494809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Choice of contraceptive modality by women in Norway.
    Skjeldestad FE.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Jan; 73(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 8304025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Characteristics of contraceptive acceptors in an urban Nigerian setting.
    Ayangade O.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1984 Feb; 22(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 6144594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Social class, religion and contraceptive failure in a sample of pregnant women in Brisbane.
    Najman JM, Keeping JD, Morrison J, Western JS, Williams GM.
    Community Health Stud; 1984 Feb; 8(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 6518752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Determinants of contraceptive method choice in an industrial city of India.
    Bhende AA, Choe MK, Rele JR, Palmore JA.
    Asia Pac Popul J; 1991 Sep; 6(3):41-66. PubMed ID: 12284858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessment of the fertility impact of family planning programmes in Egypt.
    Abdelghany AM, Naguib M, Abdelmauty N.
    Egypt Popul Fam Plann Rev; 1990 Dec; 24(2):42-59. PubMed ID: 12343741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Delayed childbearing in contemporary Spain: trends and differentials.
    Castro Martin T.
    Eur J Popul; 1992 Dec; 8(3):217-46. PubMed ID: 12317495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Contraceptive patterns of religious and racial groups in the United States, 1955-76: convergence and distinctiveness.
    Mosher WD, Goldscheider C.
    Stud Fam Plann; 1984 Dec; 15(3):101-11. PubMed ID: 6740727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.