These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

88 related items for PubMed ID: 6575649

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Percepts from scala tympani stimulation.
    Tong YC, Clark GM.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():264-7. PubMed ID: 6575650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cochlear or nerve stimulation.
    White RL.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jan; 10(1 Pt 2):232-6. PubMed ID: 2436184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Current distributions in the cat cochlea: a modelling and electrophysiological study.
    O'Leary SJ, Black RC, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 3840160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Loudness scaling in cochlear implant patients within the scope of preoperative evaluation].
    Müller J, Schön F.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 8172631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.
    Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 214(1-2):17-27. PubMed ID: 16520009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Biophysical measurements in the implanted cochlea.
    Spelman FA, Pfingst BE, Miller JM, Hassul M, Powers WE, Clopton BM.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1980 Apr; 88(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 6773014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, Raggio MW, Leake PA.
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Electrical impedance measurements of cochlear structures using the four-electrode reflection-coefficient technique.
    Kumar G, Chokshi M, Richter CP.
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):86-94. PubMed ID: 19857561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Psychophysical evaluation of cochlear prostheses in a monkey model.
    Pfingst BE, Donaldson JA, Miller JM, Spelman FA.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1979 Jan; 88(5 Pt 1):613-25. PubMed ID: 115356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Stimulation of the facial nerve by intracochlear electrodes in otosclerosis: a computer modeling study.
    Frijns JH, Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 19574948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Design and fabrication of multiwire scala tympani electrodes.
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, Burian K.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983 Dec; 405():173-82. PubMed ID: 6575641
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH, Lenarz T, Joseph G, Battmer RD, Patrick JF, Lenarz M.
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun 12; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparing neural response telemetry amplitude growth functions with loudness growth functions: preliminary results.
    Lai WK, Dillier N.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr 12; 28(2 Suppl):42S-45S. PubMed ID: 17496644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.