These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 6577574

  • 1. A method to establish the effect of the hearing aid in noise using Victoreen signal threshold and speech discrimination.
    Lindström B, Svärd I, Bredberg G, Lundborg T.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 18():45-55. PubMed ID: 6577574
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
    Plomp R, Duquesnoy AJ.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.
    Plomp R.
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8194676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984 Feb; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Acoustic aspects of auditory training with and without hearing aid.
    Ludvigsen C.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Feb; (Suppl 10):69-83. PubMed ID: 6934609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Effect of venting the ear mold on speech discrimination in masking noise].
    Brügel FJ, Schorn K, Fastl H.
    HNO; 1991 Sep; 39(9):356-61. PubMed ID: 1748579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Protocol for evaluation of the effect of hearing aid electroacoustic parameters on perception of amplified speech.
    Lawrence DW, Blackledge VO.
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977 Sep; 2(6):197-201. PubMed ID: 893188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?
    Fabry DA, Leek MR, Walden BE, Cord M.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Sep; 30(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 8126656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A, Walliker JR, Howard IS, Ball V, Fourcin AJ.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Sep; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Audiovisual speech perception ability in adult patients.
    Holmkvist C, Risberg A, Bredberg G, Lundborg T.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983 Jun; 18():11-21. PubMed ID: 6577572
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Hearing rehabilitation, possibilities and limitations].
    Ritsma RJ.
    Ned Tijdschr Gerontol; 1979 Aug; 10(3):144-51. PubMed ID: 492596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C, Kramer SE, Houtgast T.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Evaluation of hearing improvement due to hearing aids].
    Welzl-Müller K, Sattler K.
    HNO; 1985 Jun; 33(6):275-8. PubMed ID: 4030411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids. Audiologic results and the patients' opinions.
    Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7739870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Present status and outlook of the implantable hearing aid.
    Gyo K, Yanagihara N, Saiki T, Hinohira Y.
    Am J Otol; 1990 Jul; 11(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 2399943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M, Grayden D, Dowell RC, Lawrence D.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N, Frölich T, Kompis M, Bögli H, Lai WK.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Apr; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech recognition with the bone-anchored hearing aid determined objectively and subjectively.
    Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 8168444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The bone-anchored hearing aid: principal design and audiometric results.
    Håkansson BE, Carlsson PU, Tjellström A, Lidén G.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Sep; 73(9):670-5. PubMed ID: 7988397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.