These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 6584820

  • 1. Use of xeroradiography for length determination in endodontics.
    San Marco PA, Montgomery S.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 6584820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison between xeroradiographs and conventional radiographs as an aid in root canal therapy for maxillary molars.
    Alexander JB, Andrews JD.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Apr; 67(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 2726205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths.
    Pratten DH, McDonald NJ.
    J Endod; 1996 Apr; 22(4):173-6. PubMed ID: 8935014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus film versus Ultraspeed film for endodontic working length determination.
    Brown R, Hadley JN, Chambers DW.
    J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 9487870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography.
    Leddy BJ, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown CE.
    J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography.
    Melius B, Jiang J, Zhu Q.
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11833685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Xeroradiography and its clinical use].
    Matsui I, Komatsu H, Kohirazawa H, Shimokobe H.
    DE J Dent Eng; 1985 Feb; (72):34-9. PubMed ID: 3926391
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Radiographic "working length" revisited.
    Stein TJ, Corcoran JF.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):796-800. PubMed ID: 1488238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Xeroradiography of dental structures. III. Pilot clinical studies.
    Gratt BM.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Sep; 48(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 289933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation.
    Ellingsen MA, Harrington GW, Hollender LG.
    J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):326-31. PubMed ID: 7673842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Manual instrument sequence in endodontics].
    Machtou P.
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1985 Jun; 14(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 3869332
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans in comparison with periapical radiographs for root canal length measurement: an in situ study.
    Metska ME, Liem VM, Parsa A, Koolstra JH, Wesselink PR, Ozok AR.
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1206-9. PubMed ID: 25069934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.