These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

831 related items for PubMed ID: 6589731

  • 1. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition.
    Hällgren M, Larsby B, Arlinger S.
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):227-37. PubMed ID: 16684704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E, Warzybok A, Kutzner D.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
    Borg E, Edquist G, Reinholdson AC, Risberg A, McAllister B.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands.
    van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):348-55. PubMed ID: 18569107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S, Dillon H.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners.
    Rhebergen KS, Versfeld NJ, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 18389414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S, Dillon H, Newall P.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise.
    Hagerman B.
    Scand Audiol; 1984 Feb; 13(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 6719016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 42.