These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial. Bettmann MA, Higgins CB. Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S70-4. PubMed ID: 3882619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Seeger JF, Carmody RF, Smith JR, Horsley WW, Criss E. Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol. Sackett JF, Bergsjordet B, Seeger JF, Cacayorin ED. Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Iohexol in cardioangiography. Survey and present state. Tylén U. Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():94-100. PubMed ID: 6382942 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents. Mancini GB, Bloomquist JN, Bhargava V, Stein JB, Lew W, Slutsky RA, Shabetai R, Higgins CB. Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-ionic contrast media in cardioangiography in infants. A comparison of iohexol and metrizamide. Hellström M, Jacobsson B, Eriksson BO, Jagenburg R. Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Apr; 366():126-33. PubMed ID: 6206687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media vs. iohexol. Wolf GL. Invest Radiol; 1985 Apr; 20(1 Suppl):S108-11. PubMed ID: 3882612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of intravenous administration of a new nonionic dimeric contrast medium on the coronary circulation. Comparison with monomeric ionic and nonionic media. Lanzer P, Dean PB, Lipton MJ, Sievers R, Botvinick E, Higgins CB. Invest Radiol; 1985 Oct; 20(7):746-50. PubMed ID: 4066245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate. Taenzer V, Heep H, Clauss W. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983 Oct; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemodynamic effects of contrast media during coronary angiography: a comparison of three nonionic agents to Hypaque-76. Piao ZE, Murdock DK, Hwang MH, Raymond RM, Scanlon PJ. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988 Oct; 14(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 3349517 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate. Bani E, Federighi F, Ghio R, Marchitiello M, Galigani P, Palla R. Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985 Oct; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Tolerability and usefulness of iohexol in cardioangiography. II. A double blind comparison with metrizoate. Levorstad K, Simonsen S, Jervell J. Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Oct; 366():101-10. PubMed ID: 6382927 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Iohexol compared with diatrizoate in pediatric urography. Jorulf H. Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Oct; 366():42-5. PubMed ID: 6591740 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Iohexol in coronary angiography. A comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media. Selin K, Emanuelsson H, Renaa T. Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Oct; 366():115-20. PubMed ID: 6382928 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]