These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 6592916

  • 1. Efficacy of cotton-tipped applicators for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix for Papanicolaou smears.
    Shen JT, Nalick RH, Schlaerth JB, Morrow CP.
    Acta Cytol; 1984; 28(5):541-5. PubMed ID: 6592916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG, Sadeghi M, Fotheringham N, Semrad N, Watring WG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I, Gomousa M.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Nov; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP, Dickinson K, d'Ablaing G, Schlaerth JB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B, Gearhart J, Evers CG, Cason Z, Replogle WH.
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB, Hølund B, Grinsted P.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Mar; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
    Partoll LM, Javaheri G.
    Acta Cytol; 1993 Mar; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F, Boon ME, Beck S, Knottnerus JA, Essed GG.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Mar; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Studies on a cell sampling method in mass screening for uterine cervical cancer--comparison of data obtained with a cotton tipped applicator, wooden spatula and cotton tipped applicator plus colposcopy].
    Takahashi K, Yamane Y, Yoshino K, Shibukawa T, Yamamoto K, Iwanari O, Matsunaga I, Kitao M.
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Jul; 37(7):1117-24. PubMed ID: 4031569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
    Hoffman MS, Hill DA, Gordy LW, Lane J, Cavanagh D.
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
    Stillson T, Knight AL, Elswick RK.
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Are Papanicolaou smears enough? Acetic acid washes of the cervix as adjunctive therapy: a HARNET study. Harrisburg Area Research Network.
    Slawson DC, Bennett JH, Herman JM.
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Sep; 35(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 1517723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
    Helderman G, Graham L, Cannon D, Waters K, Feller D.
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Nov; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The efficacy of an endocervical brush in obtaining adequate Papanicolaou smears.
    Grossman MB, Clofine R.
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 Sep; 91(9):875-9. PubMed ID: 1757278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
    Altermatt HJ, Wyler K, Fravi R, Liu X, Kraft R, Dreher E.
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun 11; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A, De Marchi WG, Bell V, Nishikawa R.
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb 01; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.