These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 6592916

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Spatula/cytobrush vs. spatula/cotton swab detection of cervical condylomatous lesions.
    Selvaggi SM.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):629-33. PubMed ID: 2810246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: effect of different techniques in specific fertility states.
    Hamblin JE, Brock CD, Litchfield L, Dias J.
    J Fam Pract; 1985 Mar; 20(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 3973541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The value of the Cytobrush for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix.
    Kawaguchi K, Nogi M, Ohya M, Nishikawa Y, Kobayashi TK.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1987 Sep; 3(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 3665693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
    Kristensen GB, Jensen LK, Ejersbo D, Hølund B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Sep; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY, Stanbridge EJ.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
    Harrison DD, Hernandez E, Dunton CJ.
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparative cytologic yield and quality of three Pap smear instruments.
    Toffler WL, Pluedeman CK, Sinclair AE, Ireland KM, Byrne BJ.
    Fam Med; 1993 Jun; 25(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 8349063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Improved yield of endocervical cells on Papanicolaou smears in a residency setting.
    Kivlahan C, Ingram E.
    J Fam Pract; 1985 Apr; 20(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 3981098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
    Beilby JO, Bourne R, Guillebaud J, Steele ST.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparison of two Papanicolaou smear techniques in a family practice setting.
    Reissman SE.
    J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):525-9. PubMed ID: 3367117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
    Ferenczy A, Robitaille J, Guralnick M, Shatz R.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.