These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

88 related items for PubMed ID: 6596834

  • 1. Effects of signal processing by the House-3M cochlear implant on consonant perception.
    Edgerton BJ, Brimacombe JA.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():115-23. PubMed ID: 6596834
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Analysis and synthesis of speech regarding cochlear implant.
    Carrat R.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():85-94. PubMed ID: 6596855
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Use of acoustic cues by children with cochlear implants.
    Giezen MR, Escudero P, Baker A.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1440-57. PubMed ID: 20689031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM, Julyan PJ, Hastings DL, Ramsden RT.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC, Stickney G, Mishra L, Assmann P.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Analytic importance of the coding features for the discrimination of vowels in the cochlear implant signal.
    Berger-Vachon C, Gallego S, Morgon A, Truy E.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():351-3. PubMed ID: 7668702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cochlear implant experience at the University of British Columbia.
    Doyle PJ, Pijl S.
    J Otolaryngol; 1987 Oct; 16(5):300-6. PubMed ID: 3682051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Sound signal processing.
    Chouard CH, Meyer B, Chabolle F, Alcaras N, Gegu D.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984 Oct; 411():95-104. PubMed ID: 6596857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Modeling the effect of channel number and interaction on consonant recognition in a cochlear implant peak-picking strategy.
    Verschuur C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1723-36. PubMed ID: 19275329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
    Hiraumi H, Tsuji J, Kanemaru S, Fujino K, Ito J.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.
    Saoji AA, Litvak L, Spahr AJ, Eddins DA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):955-8. PubMed ID: 19739707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users.
    Tye-Murray N, Tyler RS.
    Ear Hear; 1989 Oct; 10(5):292-8. PubMed ID: 2792582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. What should be implemented in future cochlear implants?
    Tyler RS.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Oct; 469():268-75. PubMed ID: 2356735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Kreft HA.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of processing strategies on cochlear implant performance.
    Cohen NL, Waltzman SB.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Apr; 165():9-14. PubMed ID: 7717634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.