These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
144 related items for PubMed ID: 6618827
1. Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen: effect of contrast medium and body weight. Kormano M, Partanen K, Soimakallio S, Kivimäki T. Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):364-7. PubMed ID: 6618827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of diatrizoate, iopamidol, and ioxaglate for the contrast enhancement of experimental hepatic tumors in CT. Burgener FA, Steinmetz SD. Invest Radiol; 1985 Sep; 20(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 4066232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical comparison of Hexabrix, iopamidol, and Urografin-60 in whole body computed tomography. Spataro RF, Fischer HW, Kormano M. Invest Radiol; 1984 Sep; 19(6 Suppl):S372-5. PubMed ID: 6511276 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. CT-determined canine kidney and urine iodine concentration following intravenous administration of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide, iopamidol, and sodium ioxaglate. Brennan RE, Rapoport S, Weinberg I, Pollack HM, Curtis JA. Invest Radiol; 1982 Sep; 17(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 7076442 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Peterson JE, Bernardino ME. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):973-6. PubMed ID: 2801447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography. Sahani DV, Soulez G, Chen KM, Lepanto L, Xu JR, Nelson RC, Grazioli L, Vanzulli A, Heiken JP, Investigators of the IMPACT Study. Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):856-61. PubMed ID: 18007158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Low osmolality contrast media in peripheral arteriography--clinical comparison of ioxaglate, iopamidol, iohexol and diatrizoate]. Tajima H. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Nov 25; 45(11):1407-20. PubMed ID: 4094879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig. Jensen LI, Golman K, Nyman U, Dean PB. Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec 25; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Use of iopamidol in selective coronarography: a comparative study in relation to ioxaglate]. Thévenin P, Amiel M. Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec 25; 26(8 Pt 2):769-73. PubMed ID: 6367616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative trial of sodium meglumine ioxaglate (Hexabrix) and iopamidol (Niopam) for cerebral angiography. Molyneux AJ, Sheldon PW, Yates DA. Br J Radiol; 1982 Dec 25; 55(660):881-4. PubMed ID: 6756533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pharmacokinetics of contrast media: experimental results in dog and man with CT implications. Gardeur D, Lautrou J, Millard JC, Berger N, Metzger J. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Apr 25; 4(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 7365016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) studies on the effect of x-ray contrast media on aortic endothelium in the rat. Gospos C, Koch HK, Mathias K, Seemann W, Tan KG, Papacharalampous X. Invest Radiol; 1983 Apr 25; 18(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 6618829 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]