These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

76 related items for PubMed ID: 6622706

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
    Sharma R, Sharma SD, Mayya YS, Chourasiya G.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Application of wavelets to the evaluation of phantom images for mammography quality control.
    Alvarez M, Pina DR, Miranda JR, Duarte SB.
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov 07; 57(21):7177-90. PubMed ID: 23060095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Mammography -a guidance level and the present situation of mammographic dose-].
    Terada H.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Nov 07; 22(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 12766282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Aichinger U, Lell M, Kuchar I, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 2002 Oct 07; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Moritz J, Müller D, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 1995 Nov 07; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K, Zuguchi M, Sai M, Saito H, Yamada T, Ishibashi T, Ito D, Kimoto N, Kohzuki M, Takahashi S.
    Clin Imaging; 2005 Nov 07; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Mammography in the 1990s: the United States and Canada.
    Suleiman OH, Spelic DC, McCrohan JL, Symonds GR, Houn F.
    Radiology; 1999 Feb 07; 210(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 10207413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.
    Bosmans H, Carton AK, Rogge F, Zanca F, Jacobs J, Van Ongeval C, Nijs K, Van Steen A, Marchal G.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Feb 07; 117(1-3):120-30. PubMed ID: 16461531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.