These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
92 related items for PubMed ID: 6638027
41. The changing costs of radiation treatment for early prostate cancer in Ontario: a comparison between conventional and conformal external beam radiotherapy. Poon I, Pintilie M, Potvin M, McGowan T. Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2125-32. PubMed ID: 15003151 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Patient acceptance and reliability of new Humulin/Humalog 3.0 ml prefilled insulin pen in ten Croatian diabetes centres. Sucic M, Galic E, Cabrijan T, Ivandic A, Petrusic A, Wyatt J, Mincheva N, Milicevic Z, Malone J. Med Sci Monit; 2002 Mar; 8(3):PI21-6. PubMed ID: 11884952 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. A new batch method of preparing intravenous piggyback solutions in polyvinylchloride containers. Levy R, Kleinberg M, Lee P. Hosp Pharm; 1980 Oct; 15(10):504-6. PubMed ID: 10309298 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. A comparison of the pump syringe method with other methods for adding potassium chloride to Travenol large-volume parenterals. Moeller KA, Clyne KE. Hosp Pharm; 1980 Dec; 15(12):605-7. PubMed ID: 10249421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Overfill of common piggyback admixture solutions. Kleinberg ML, Chang P. Hosp Pharm; 1984 Oct; 19(10):657-8, 662-3, 666-70 passim. PubMed ID: 10268316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Compatibility and stability of linezolid injection admixed with three cephalosporin antibiotics. Xu QA, Trissel LA, Williams KY. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash); 2000 Oct; 40(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 10932460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of methods and costs of preparing intravenous piggyback solutions. Grey C. Hosp Pharm; 1976 Jun; 11(6):214, 18, 21-2. PubMed ID: 1026705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Effect of multidose therapy on cerebrospinal fluid penetration of cefazolin. Moore TD, Bechtel TP, Ayers LW. Am J Hosp Pharm; 1981 Oct; 38(10):1496-9. PubMed ID: 7294044 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Inline fluid dynamics in piggyback and manifold drug delivery systems. Leissing NC, Story KO, Zaske D. Am J Hosp Pharm; 1989 Jan; 46(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 2712034 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of postinfusion phlebitis in intravenous push versus intravenous piggyback cefazolin. Biggar C, Nichols C. J Infus Nurs; 2012 Jan; 35(6):384-8. PubMed ID: 23132087 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Justification of a pharmacy intravenous admixture service in an Australian hospital. Plumridge RJ, Maher M. Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Mar; 50(3):463-6. PubMed ID: 8442462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Use of clinical pharmacists to reduce cefamandole, cefoxitin, and ticarcillin costs. Abramowitz PW, Nold EG, Hatfield SM. Am J Hosp Pharm; 1982 Jul; 39(7):1176-80. PubMed ID: 7114059 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. An evaluation of patient preference for an alternative insulin delivery system compared to standard vial and syringe. Stockl K, Ory C, Vanderplas A, Nicklasson L, Lyness W, Cobden D, Chang E. Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Jan; 23(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 17257475 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Adsorption of (99m)Tc-radiopharmaceuticals onto injection vials and syringes. Mushtaq A, Ur Rehman T, Safdar Mansur M, Jehangir M. J Nucl Med Technol; 2008 Jun; 36(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 18483140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Prospective randomized comparison of single-dose versus 1-day cefazolin for prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery. Su HY, Ding DC, Chen DC, Lu MF, Liu JY, Chang FY. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):384-9. PubMed ID: 15762971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. An analysis of drug delivery dynamics via a pediatric central venous infusion system: quantification of delays in achieving intended doses. Bartels K, Moss DR, Peterfreund RA. Anesth Analg; 2009 Oct; 109(4):1156-61. PubMed ID: 19762743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Robotic system for i.v. antineoplastic drug preparation: description and preliminary evaluation under simulated conditions. Cote DD, Torchia MG. Am J Hosp Pharm; 1989 Nov; 46(11):2286-93. PubMed ID: 2589345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. A cost benefit comparison of two antibiotic delivery systems in a children's hospital. O'Brodovich ML. Can J Hosp Pharm; 1985 Oct; 38(5):144-6. PubMed ID: 10311321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Medication adherence and the associated health-economic impact among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus converting to insulin pen therapy: an analysis of third-party managed care claims data. Lee WC, Balu S, Cobden D, Joshi AV, Pashos CL. Clin Ther; 2006 Oct; 28(10):1712-25; discussion 1710-1. PubMed ID: 17157128 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]