These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

94 related items for PubMed ID: 6646969

  • 1. Recognition thresholds for a speech continuum following selective adaptation.
    Harris LB, Pastore RE.
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Sep; 34(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 6646969
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Attention modulates auditory adaptation produced by amplitude modulation.
    Kawashima T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):EL123-7. PubMed ID: 19894786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Locus of selective adaptation in speech perception.
    Jamieson DG, Cheesman MF.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 Aug; 12(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 2943856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Auditory and phonetic processes in place perception for stops.
    Sawusch JR, Nusbaum HC.
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Dec; 34(6):560-8. PubMed ID: 6664813
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Adaptive estimation of phoneme boundaries and selective adaptation for speech.
    Raz I, Wightman FL.
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Jul; 36(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 6493961
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech encoding in the auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implants.
    Sachs MB, Young ED, Miller MI.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983 Jul; 405():94-113. PubMed ID: 6575675
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Optimal acoustic conditions for binaural speech perception by patients with asymmetrical neurosensory hearing loss].
    Belov IM, Grechukhina TV, Kuks EN, Mal'tseva NV.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1981 Jul; (2):6-9. PubMed ID: 7222371
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A possible auditory basis for internal structure of phonetic categories.
    Miller JL, Connine CM, Schermer TM, Kluender KR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jun; 73(6):2124-33. PubMed ID: 6875098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Spectral and threshold effects on recognition of speech at higher-than-normal levels.
    Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):310-20. PubMed ID: 16875228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Which syllable does an intervocalic stop belong to? A selective adaptation study.
    Samuel AG, Kat D, Tartter VC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Dec; 76(6):1652-63. PubMed ID: 6520303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. When selective adaptation and contrast effects are distinct: a reply to Diehl, Kluender, and Parker.
    Sawusch JR, Mullennix JW.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Apr; 11(2):242-56. PubMed ID: 3159837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Limits on alternative auditory representations of speech.
    Studdert-Kennedy M.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983 Apr; 405():33-8. PubMed ID: 6223553
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Articulation index predictions for hearing-impaired listeners with and without cochlear dead regions.
    Rankovic CM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2545-8; author reply 2549-50. PubMed ID: 12083183
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds.
    Smoorenburg GF, Willeboer C, van Dijk JE.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2002 Sep; 7(6):335-47. PubMed ID: 12401965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Adaptation of neuromagnetic N1 responses to phonetic stimuli by visual speech in humans.
    Jääskeläinen IP, Ojanen V, Ahveninen J, Auranen T, Levänen S, Möttönen R, Tarnanen I, Sams M.
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec 22; 15(18):2741-4. PubMed ID: 15597045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Audiovisual presentation demonstrates that selective adaptation in speech perception is purely auditory.
    Roberts M, Summerfield Q.
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Oct 22; 30(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 7322807
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of speaker age on speech recognition and perceived listening effort in older adults with hearing loss.
    McAuliffe MJ, Wilding PJ, Rickard NA, O'Beirne GA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun 22; 55(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 22232404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Thresholds for second formant transitions in front vowels.
    Kewley-Port D, Goodman SS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov 22; 118(5):3252-60. PubMed ID: 16334904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Psychometrically equivalent spondaic words spoken by a female speaker.
    Wilson RH, Strouse A.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Dec 22; 42(6):1336-46. PubMed ID: 10599616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.