These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


168 related items for PubMed ID: 668241

  • 41. [Results and experiences with an autocorrelating ultrasonic cardiotocograph].
    Rüttgers H, Auer L.
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1983; 187(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 6683443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. The relevance of antenatal and intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns to fetal outcome.
    Liu DT, Blackwell RJ, Tukel S.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Apr; 85(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 638096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. [Memo concerning cardiotocography (CTG)].
    Löfstrand T, Helmby C.
    Jordemodern; 1982 Apr; 95(7-8):231-43. PubMed ID: 6921197
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. [Potentials of cardiotocography in assessing the antenatal risk in EPH gestoses].
    Bozhinova S.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1984 Apr; 23(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 6742360
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. [Characteristics of the frequency spectrum of the fetal electrocardiogram].
    Eisenberg de Smoler P, Lindig M, Domínguez de Costa CG.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1984 Oct; 52(330):241-6. PubMed ID: 6510735
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Cetrulo CL, Freeman R.
    Obstet Gynecol Annu; 1978 Oct; 7():125-34. PubMed ID: 662214
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Limitations of autocorrelation in fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Fukushima T, Flores CA, Hon EH, Davidson EC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov 15; 153(6):685-92. PubMed ID: 3904462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. A simple method for continuous recording of fetal systolic time interval.
    Landini L, Righi E, Zacutti A.
    J Nucl Med Allied Sci; 1977 Nov 15; 21(1-2):48-50. PubMed ID: 915547
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Nonstress antepartum fetal monitoring.
    Paul RH, Keegan KA.
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Aug 15; 6(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 498685
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. The indirectly obtained fetal heart rate: comparison of first- and second-generation electronic fetal monitors.
    Boehm FH, Fields LM, Hutchison JM, Bowen AW, Vaughn WK.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jul 15; 155(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 3524232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. [The 1st Bulgarian obstetrical monitor--the AM-1].
    Khadzhiev A, Novakov L, Dimitrova M, Daskalov I.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1985 Jul 15; 24(5):18-21. PubMed ID: 3911783
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.