These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 6687897

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Development of a serial comparison program for conduction defects, acute myocardial infarction, and the use of additional leads.
    Ariet M, DeLuca DC, Gregg RE, Zhou SH, Greenfield JC.
    J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 21168003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Comparison of 3 ECG computer programs with interpretation by physicians].
    Saner H, Lindeland A, Scallen R, Paule W, Lange HW, Gobel FL.
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jul 07; 117(27-28):1035-9. PubMed ID: 3303319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Development of a new approach to serial analysis. The manufacturer's viewpoint.
    Hedstrom K, Macfarlane PW.
    J Electrocardiol; 1996 Jul 07; 29 Suppl():35-40. PubMed ID: 9238375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Computerized serial comparison of electrocardiograms: program performance in myocardial infarction.
    Ariet M, Zhou S, DeLuca DC, Greenfield JC.
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Apr 07; 40(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 17118395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative diagnostic performance of the Telemed computer ECG program.
    Bernard P, Chaitman BR, Scholl JM, Val PG, Chabot M.
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Jan 07; 16(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 6220102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Computer program for diagnostic evaluation of electrocardiograms.
    Wartak J, Milliken JA, Karchmar J.
    Comput Biomed Res; 1971 Jun 07; 4(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 4935055
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].
    Morisbak B, Gjesdal K.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep 30; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. 3. Reproducibility testing and the sources of program errors.
    Bailey JJ, Horton M, Itscoitz SB.
    Circulation; 1974 Jul 30; 50(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 4276020
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. II. Application to version D of the PHS program and the Mayo Clinic program of 1968.
    Bailey JJ, Itscoitz SB, Grauer LE, Hirshfeld JW, Horton MR.
    Circulation; 1974 Jul 30; 50(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 4276019
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Computer-based ECG analysis in acute myocardial infarction. A comparison between two computer programs for the detection of ventricular arrhythmias.
    Hulting J, Blomqvist P, Nygårds ME.
    Acta Med Scand; 1977 Jul 30; 201(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 899865
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.