These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
135 related items for PubMed ID: 6692513
21. Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. Fleming RM, Kirkeeide RL, Smalling RW, Gould KL. J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Oct; 18(4):945-51. PubMed ID: 1894868 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative coronary arteriography: estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using the arteriogram and digital computation. Brown BG, Bolson E, Frimer M, Dodge HT. Circulation; 1977 Feb; 55(2):329-37. PubMed ID: 832350 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography using videodensitometry. An in vivo analysis. Simons MA, Muskett AD, Kruger RA, Klausner SC, Burton NA, Nelson JA. Invest Radiol; 1988 Feb; 23(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 3277924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of observer and videodensitometric measurements of simulated coronary artery stenoses. Simons MA, Bastian BV, Bray BE, Dedrickson DR. Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):562-8. PubMed ID: 3305413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of digital and cine coronary arteriography. Gurley JC, Nissen SE. Int J Card Imaging; 1990 Jul; 5(2-3):105-18. PubMed ID: 2230289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Computer-aided interpretation of coronary cineangiograms. Accuracy of automatic detection of stenotic lesions. Sugahara T, Yamagihara Y, Sugimoto N, Kimura K, Awano K, Azumi T. Acta Radiol; 1992 Jan; 33(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 1731845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital subtraction coronary angiography using high-pass temporal filtration: a comparison with cineangiography. Bray BE, Anderson FL, Hardin CW, Kruger RA, Sutton RB, Nelson JA. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985 Jan; 11(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3884167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Can the same edge-detection algorithm be applied to on-line and off-line analysis systems? Validation of a new cinefilm-based geometric coronary measurement software. Haase J, van der Linden MM, Di Mario C, van der Giessen WJ, Foley DP, Serruys PW. Am Heart J; 1993 Aug; 126(2):312-21. PubMed ID: 8338000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Improved diagnosis in coronary cinearteriography with routine use of 110 degrees oblique views and cranial and caudal angulations. Comparison with standard transverse oblique views in 100 patients. Aldridge HE, McLoughlin MJ, Taylor KW. Am J Cardiol; 1975 Oct 06; 36(4):468-73. PubMed ID: 1190051 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: an in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries. Di Mario C, Haase J, den Boer A, Reiber JH, Serruys PW. Am Heart J; 1992 Nov 06; 124(5):1181-9. PubMed ID: 1442484 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Rotating step-wedge technique for extraction of luminal cross-sectional area information from single plane coronary cineangiograms. Spears JR. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1981 Nov 06; 22(3A):217-25. PubMed ID: 7315499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Comparison of quantitative coronary arteriography using cinefilm and digital images]. Arai H, Sato H, Aizawa T, Watanabe H. J Cardiol; 2001 May 06; 37(5):241-8. PubMed ID: 11392892 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of two methods to measure coronary flow reserve in the setting of coronary angioplasty: intracoronary blood flow velocity measurements with a Doppler catheter, and digital subtraction cineangiography. Serruys PW, Zijlstra F, Laarman GJ, Reiber HH, Beatt K, Roelandt J. Eur Heart J; 1989 Aug 06; 10(8):725-36. PubMed ID: 2529120 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Prediction of the physiologic significance of coronary arterial lesions by quantitative lesion geometry in patients with limited coronary artery disease. Wilson RF, Marcus ML, White CW. Circulation; 1987 Apr 06; 75(4):723-32. PubMed ID: 3829334 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Does the quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions predict the physiologic significance of a coronary stenosis? Zijlstra F, van Ommeren J, Reiber JH, Serruys PW. Circulation; 1987 Jun 06; 75(6):1154-61. PubMed ID: 3552308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Reiber JH, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ, Wijns W, Slager CJ, Gerbrands JJ, Schuurbiers JC, den Boer A, Hugenholtz PG. Circulation; 1985 Feb 06; 71(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 3965172 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Comparisons of images simultaneously documented by digital subtraction coronary arteriography and cine coronary arteriography]. Kimura K, Takamiya M, Yamamoto K, Ohta M, Naito H. J Cardiol; 1988 Dec 06; 18(4):889-97. PubMed ID: 3267727 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Quantitative analysis of coronary arteriogram by a computer-assisted method]. Shen W. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 1991 Apr 06; 19(2):89-90, 124. PubMed ID: 1879319 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Limitation of detection and evaluation of coronary arterial stenosis by densitometry. Sugahara T, Kimura K, Yanagihara Y, Sugimoto N, Azumi T. Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Mar 06; 10(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 8021529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Automated extraction, labelling and analysis of the coronary vasculature from arteriograms. Dumay AC, Gerbrands JJ, Reiber JH. Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Sep 06; 10(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 7876660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]