These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
96 related items for PubMed ID: 6724172
1. Test-retest reliability of a forced-choice procedure for determining most comfortable loudness level for speech. Wall LG, Gans RE. Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 6724172 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Four spondee threshold procedures: a comparison. Wall LG, Davis LA, Myers DK. Ear Hear; 1984; 5(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 6734969 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a clinical method for measuring comfortable loudness for speech. Ventry IM, Johnson JI. J Speech Hear Disord; 1978 May; 43(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 661252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between pure-tone and speech loudness discomfort levels among hearing-impaired subjects. Beattie RC, Boyd RL. J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 May; 51(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3702359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels: six decades of research. Punch J, Joseph- A, Rakerd B. Am J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 13(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 15903140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The contour test of loudness perception. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Taylor IM, Gray GA. Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):388-400. PubMed ID: 9360862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired. Sammeth CA, Birman M, Hecox KE. Ear Hear; 1989 Apr; 10(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 2707507 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring spectral and temporal resolution simultaneously: a comparison between two tests. van Esch TE, Dreschler WA. Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):477-90. PubMed ID: 21506893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In situ Hearing Tests for the Purpose of a Self-Fit Hearing Aid. Boymans M, Dreschler WA. Audiol Neurootol; 2017 Jul; 22(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 28434002 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comfortable loudness judgments for discrete frequency signals. Berger KW, Harrison LD, Monack N, Ferren GE. J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 7345058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Boothroyd A. J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 6716999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency selectivity and speech intelligibility in noise. Lyregaard PE. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982 Mar; 15():113-22. PubMed ID: 6955919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship of continuous (C) and interrupted (I) tones at threshold and most comfortable loudness (MCL) in hearing-impaired ears. Dancer J, Ventry IM. Ear Hear; 1984 May; 5(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 6539262 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]