These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 6724177

  • 1. Telephone listening ability for hearing-impaired individuals.
    Holmes AE, Frank T.
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 6724177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids.
    Neuman AC, Bakke MH, Hellman S, Levitt H.
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 8549896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of amplification on the discrimination of dichotic consonant-vowel syllables in a population with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jacobson JT, McCandless GA, Mahoney TM.
    Audiology; 1979 Aug; 18(6):522-36. PubMed ID: 526197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Difference between the default telecoil (t-coil) and programmed microphone frequency response in behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids.
    Putterman DB, Valente M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):366-78. PubMed ID: 22533979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Relationship between aided preferred listening level and long-term listening range.
    Cox RM.
    Ear Hear; 1984 Oct; 5(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 6724174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech pattern audiometry in hearing impaired children.
    Mac Ardle B, Hazan V, Prasher D.
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Dec; 33(6):383-93. PubMed ID: 10656599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multichannel amplitude compression.
    Moore BC, Füllgrabe C.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):657-66. PubMed ID: 20526199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the NAL(R) and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids.
    Peters RW, Moore BC, Glasberg BR, Stone MA.
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 10759075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Acoustical changes of loudly spoken speech and their effects on speech recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Tschopp K, Käser H, Kunert F.
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Jun; 26(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 1393153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Quality rating test of hearing aid benefit in the NIDCD/VA Clinical Trial.
    Noffsinger D, Haskell GB, Larson VD, Williams DW, Wilson E, Plunkett S, Kenworthy D.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):291-300. PubMed ID: 12195171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of presentation levels to maximize word recognition scores.
    Guthrie LA, Mackersie CL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Jun; 20(6):381-90. PubMed ID: 19594086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of wireless and acoustic hearing aid-based telephone listening strategies.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jun; 32(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 20808225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM, Humes LE.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired.
    Sammeth CA, Birman M, Hecox KE.
    Ear Hear; 1989 Apr; 10(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 2707507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF, Doherty KA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech discrimination tests with hearing aids in tele-coil listening mode. A comparative study in school children.
    Pettersson E.
    Scand Audiol; 1987 Oct; 16(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3589475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.