These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


433 related items for PubMed ID: 6738092

  • 1. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience.
    Joyce LD, Nelson RM.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jul; 88(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 6738092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
    Hartz RS, Fisher EB, Finkelmeier B, DeBoer A, Sanders JH, Moran JM, Michaelis LL.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses.
    Bloomfield P, Kitchin AH, Wheatley DJ, Walbaum PR, Lutz W, Miller HC.
    Circulation; 1986 Jun; 73(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 3516447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD, Bortolotti U, Mazzucco A, Guerra F, Magni A, Gallucci V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards valves. A comparative analysis.
    Nashef SA, Sethia B, Turner MA, Davidson KG, Lewis S, Bain WH.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Mar; 93(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 3821149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
    Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, DeSmet JM, Danielson GK, Pluth JR, Puga FJ.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
    Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, Prescott RJ, Miller HC.
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb 28; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves.
    Goldman B, Scully H, Tong C, Mandell R, Butany J, Azuma J, Schwartz L.
    Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep 28; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
    Murakami T, Eishi K, Nakano S, Kobayashi J, Sasako Y, Isobe F, Kosakai Y, Kito Y, Kawashima Y.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan 28; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft.
    Bortolotti U, Milano A, Thiene G, Guerra F, Mazzucco A, Valente M, Talenti E, Gallucci V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug 28; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Long-term comparative analysis of the Björk-Shiley and Hancock valves implanted in 1975.
    Martinell J, Fraile J, Artiz V, Moreno J, Rábago G.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov 28; 90(5):741-9. PubMed ID: 4058046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Heart valve replacement--a report of 8- to 17-year follow-up.
    Kimura M, Kitasato K, Kamatani M.
    Igaku Kenkyu; 1992 Apr 28; 62(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 1523944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement.
    Khan SS, Trento A, DeRobertis M, Kass RM, Sandhu M, Czer LS, Blanche C, Raissi S, Fontana GP, Cheng W, Chaux A, Matloff JM.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug 28; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H, Rudolph W.
    Herz; 1986 Apr 28; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve replacements].
    Mühlberger V, Schistek R, Hopferwieser T, Schwaiger A, Scharfetter H, Knapp E.
    Z Kardiol; 1986 Jun 28; 75(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 3751218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up.
    Hammond GL, Geha AS, Kopf GS, Hashim SW.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb 28; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of porcine biological valves with pericardial valves--a 12-year clinical experience with 1123 bio-prostheses.
    Reichenspurner H, Weinhold C, Nollert G, Kaulbach HG, Vetter HO, Boehm DH, Reichart B.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Feb 28; 43(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 7540324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical experience with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine xenograft.
    Jamieson MP, Bennett JG, Robles A, Ross DN.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Aug 28; 29(4):200-5. PubMed ID: 6179185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses.
    Murphy DA, Levine FH, Buckley MJ, Swinski L, Daggett WM, Akins CW, Austen WG.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov 28; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Early and late term results of triple valve replacements. Use of a tricuspid bioprosthesis].
    Mikaeloff P, Delahaye JP, Convert G, Van Haecke P, Amouroux C, Boivin J.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Jun 28; 74(6):719-25. PubMed ID: 6457576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.