These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

93 related items for PubMed ID: 6741566

  • 21. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Stachurski M.
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Perimetry while moving the eyes: implications for the variability of visual field defects.
    Toepfer A, Kasten E, Guenther T, Sabel BA.
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 28(4):308-19. PubMed ID: 19145132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Brief Communication: visual-field superiority as a function of stimulus type and content: further evidence.
    Basu A, Mandal MK.
    Int J Neurosci; 2004 Jul; 114(7):833-9. PubMed ID: 15204048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Ventriloquism aftereffects occur in the rear hemisphere.
    Sarlat L, Warusfel O, Viaud-Delmon I.
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Sep 01; 404(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 16806699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Interaction of visual hemifield and body view in biological motion perception.
    de Lussanet MH, Fadiga L, Michels L, Seitz RJ, Kleiser R, Lappe M.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Jan 01; 27(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 18215244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 17; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Effect of stimulus localisation on motion-onset VEP.
    Kremlácek J, Kuba M, Chlubnová J, Kubová Z.
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec 17; 44(26):2989-3000. PubMed ID: 15474572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The effects of visual surround eccentricity and size on manual and postural control.
    Previc FH, Neel RL.
    J Vestib Res; 1995 Dec 17; 5(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 8589851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Scene categorization at large visual eccentricities.
    Boucart M, Moroni C, Thibaut M, Szaffarczyk S, Greene M.
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun 28; 86():35-42. PubMed ID: 23597581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Estimating the position of simulated phosphenes using a tactile guide.
    Lu Y, Fan J, Zhou C, Zhao Y, Wang J, Tao C, Ren Q, Chai X.
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011 Jun 28; 24(2):125-40. PubMed ID: 21864454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Perceived duration decreases with increasing eccentricity.
    Kliegl KM, Huckauf A.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul 28; 150():136-45. PubMed ID: 24880978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Age-related functional field losses are not eccentricity dependent.
    Seiple W, Szlyk JP, Yang S, Holopigian K.
    Vision Res; 1996 Jun 28; 36(12):1859-66. PubMed ID: 8759453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.