These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

204 related items for PubMed ID: 6756905

  • 1. Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Appelbaum PC, Arthur RR, Parker ME, Shugar GL, von Kuster LC, Charache P.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 1(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 6756905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of the repliscan system for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Woolfrey BF, Quall CO, Fox JM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 7007430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of the updated MS-2 Bacterial Identification system in comparison with the API 20E system.
    DiPersio JR, Dyke JW, Vannest RD.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jul; 18(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 6350342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of the Repliscan II System for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Woolfrey BF, Fox JM, Quall CO.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):408-10. PubMed ID: 7026608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.
    Appelbaum PC, Kaufmann CS, Keifer JC, Venbrux HJ.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):614-21. PubMed ID: 6355150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of Bacterial Diagnostics Kits and Systems at an Instructional Workshop.
    Fung DYC, Goldschmidt MC, Cox NA.
    J Food Prot; 1984 Jan; 47(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 30925643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Evaluation of the usefulness of tests for production of Beta-D-glucuronidase and propylene glycol utilization for the differentiation of enterobacteriaceae rods].
    Kaluzewski S, Tomczuk D.
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1995 Jan; 47(3-4):155-68. PubMed ID: 8833927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Rapid catalase supplemental test for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Chester B, Moskowitz LB.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Feb; 25(2):439-41. PubMed ID: 3818934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Evaluation of a new semi-automatic method of identifying enterobacteriaceae, M.I.S.-Enterobacteriaceae].
    Scheftel JM, Barth JG, Vincent M.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1989 Feb; 47(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 2665580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Interest of gamma-glutamyltransferase in "Enterobacteriaceae" (author's transl)].
    Giammanco G, Buissière J, Toucas M, Brault G, Le Minor L.
    Ann Microbiol (Paris); 1980 Feb; 131A(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 6104464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the Micro-ID, the API 20E and the Rapid 20E for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Appelbaum PC, Jacobs MR, Buick MK, Flanagan MM, Gymer GA.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct; 4(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 3905400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reliability of early identifications obtained with Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards in the automicrobic system.
    Barry AL, Badal RE.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 16(2):257-65. PubMed ID: 6749890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of the four-hour Micro-ID technique for direct identification of oxidase-negative, Gram-negative rods from blood cultures.
    Appelbaum PC, Schick SF, Kellogg JA.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Oct; 12(4):533-7. PubMed ID: 6999020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Multipoint identification of Enterobacteriaceae: report of the British Society for Microbial Technology collaborative study.
    Winstanley TG, Limb DI, Wheat PF, Nicol CD.
    J Clin Pathol; 1993 Jul; 46(7):637-41. PubMed ID: 8157751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Pyrazinamidase activity of bacteria from Enterobacteriaceae family as characteristic for taxonomy].
    Sivolodskiĭ EP.
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 2006 Jul; (7):88-90. PubMed ID: 17297889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.
    O'Hara CM, Rhoden DL, Miller JM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Further differentiation of Enterobacteriaceae by means of siderophore-pattern analysis.
    Reissbrodt R, Rabsch W.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1988 May; 268(3):306-17. PubMed ID: 2970195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of identification of Enterobacteriaceae by API 20E and Sensititre Autoidentification System.
    Barr JG, Hogg GM, Smyth ET, Emmerson AM.
    J Clin Pathol; 1989 Jun; 42(6):649-52. PubMed ID: 2661593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.