These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


107 related items for PubMed ID: 6772334

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Factors affecting performance and thromboembolism after porcine xenograft cardiac valve replacement.
    Geha AS, Hammond GL, Laks H, Stansel HC, Glenn WW.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Mar; 83(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 7062749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Early follow-up of patients with the Medtronic Intact porcine valve. A new cardiac bioprosthesis.
    Jaffe WM, Barratt-Boyes BG, Sadri A, Gavin JB, Coverdale HA, Neutze JM.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Aug; 98(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 2755151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Homograft valves 10 years later. The physician's viewpoint.
    Davies H, Roberts I.
    Adv Cardiol; 1974 Aug; 11(00):198-210. PubMed ID: 4413697
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H, Rudolph W.
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Human valvular substitutes for the treatment of complex progressive endocarditis. Application to aortic, mitral and tricuspid valves].
    Grinda JM, Jouan J, Latremouille CH, Couetil JP, Carpentier A, Fabiani JN, Deloche A.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2000 Oct; 93(10):1195-201. PubMed ID: 11107478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study.
    Bernal JM, Rabasa JM, Cagigas JC, Echevarria JR, Carrion MF, Revuelta JM.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 May; 101(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 2023444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Excellent durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A sixteen-year follow-up study.
    Kawachi Y, Tominaga R, Hisahara M, Nakashima A, Yasui H, Tokunaga K.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 104(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 1453721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J, Yu W, Silver MD, David TE.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.