These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

116 related items for PubMed ID: 6773014

  • 1. Biophysical measurements in the implanted cochlea.
    Spelman FA, Pfingst BE, Miller JM, Hassul M, Powers WE, Clopton BM.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1980; 88(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 6773014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Psychophysical evaluation of cochlear prostheses in a monkey model.
    Pfingst BE, Donaldson JA, Miller JM, Spelman FA.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1979; 88(5 Pt 1):613-25. PubMed ID: 115356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Electrical impedance measurements of cochlear structures using the four-electrode reflection-coefficient technique.
    Kumar G, Chokshi M, Richter CP.
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):86-94. PubMed ID: 19857561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.
    Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackmann DE, Mladejovsky MG, Parkin JL.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978 Jan; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 736424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Investigations towards an artificial cochlea.
    Hochmair ES, Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Burian K.
    Int J Artif Organs; 1979 Sep; 2(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 582589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.
    Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 214(1-2):17-27. PubMed ID: 16520009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig.
    Stronks HC, Versnel H, Prijs VF, Klis SF.
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19840841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Determinants of the effectiveness of cochlear implants: I. Placement in the cochlea].
    Kral A, Hartmann R, Klinke R.
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000 Jan; 101(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 11039219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.