These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

130 related items for PubMed ID: 6787073

  • 1. Alternative quality control parameters for Autobac susceptibility testing disks: use of agar diffusion zone size results.
    Boshard R, Matsen JM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):814-7. PubMed ID: 6787073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Wide variability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa aminoglycoside results among seven susceptibility testing procedures.
    Staneck JL, Glenn S, DiPersio JR, Leist PA.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 27(10):2277-85. PubMed ID: 2511223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Agar disk diffusion for the quality control testing of Autobac elution disks.
    Gaydos JM, Harrington BJ.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Mar; 21(3):516-8. PubMed ID: 6808910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Examination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-gentamicin discrepancies encountered in an Autobac I-disk diffusion comparison.
    Mayo JB, Kiehn TE, Wong B, Bernard EM, Armstrong D.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Mar; 21(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 6808909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of serial plate agar dilution, Bauer-Kirby disk diffusion, and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for the determination of susceptibilities of Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ten antimicrobial agents.
    Fekete T, Tumah H, Woodwell J, Truant A, Satishchandran V, Axelrod P, Kreter B.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Apr; 18(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 7924222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.
    Thornsberry C, Gavan TL, Sherris JC, Balows A, Matsen JM, Sabath LD, Schoenknecht F, Thrupp LD, Washington JA.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1975 Apr; 7(4):466-80. PubMed ID: 1147582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Susceptibility testing with the autobac system (author's transl)].
    Baars B, Opferkuch W.
    Immun Infekt; 1978 Dec; 6(6):270-3. PubMed ID: 103806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison and evaluation of carbenicillin disks in diffusion susceptibility testing.
    Matsen JM, Lund ME, Brooker DC.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1974 Jun; 5(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 15825412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Laboratory evaluation of an automated antimicrobial susceptibility system.
    Stubbs KG, Wicher K.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1977 Dec; 68(6):769-777. PubMed ID: 602916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Inter- and intralaboratory variability in antibiotic susceptibility tests with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae.
    Barry AL, Schoenknecht FD, Norton R, O'Brien TF, Matsen JM, Thornsberry C, Thrupp LD, Markley E, Gavan TL.
    J Infect Dis; 1976 Oct; 134(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 185302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Ofloxacin susceptibility testing quality control parameters for microdilution and disk diffusion, and confirmation of disk diffusion interpretive criteria.
    Fuchs PC, Jones RN, Barry AL, Gavan TL.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Jan; 27(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 2492304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Facilitating quality control of the antimicrobial susceptibility test.
    Fluornoy DJ.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):231-2. PubMed ID: 6780602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cefoperazone disk diffusion susceptibility test: confirmation of the tentative interpretive criteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-resistance, and determination of quality control performance limits.
    Jones RN, Gavan TL, Barry AL, Thornsberry C, Gibbs DL.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):777-86. PubMed ID: 6212596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing for clinical and epidemiologic purposes.
    Graham DR, Dixon RE, Hughes JM, Thornsberry C.
    Am J Infect Control; 1985 Dec; 13(6):241-9. PubMed ID: 3936382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Quality control in antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing: a Belgian multicenter study.
    Lauwers S, Philippe J, Van Zeebroeck A, Pierard D, Derde MP, Kaufman L.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991 Aug; 10(8):652-6. PubMed ID: 1748119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility test results: how guilty a laboratory could be?
    Nassar MSM, Hazzah WA, Bakr WMK.
    J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 2019 Aug; 94(1):4. PubMed ID: 30686832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of cefamandole susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriacea by the autobac 1 system.
    de Girolami PC, Maher LA, Booth MT, St George DM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Oct; 12(4):546-9. PubMed ID: 6999021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Quality control limits for ampicillin, carbenicillin, mezlocillin, and piperacillin disk diffusion susceptibility tests: a collaborative study.
    Gavan TL, Jones RN, Barry AL, Fuchs PC, Gerlach EH, Matsen JM, Reller LB, Thornsberry C, Thrupp LD.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jul; 14(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 6455443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of two standardized disk methods for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and of the Enterobacteriaceae.
    Barry AL, Effinger LJ.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1974 Oct; 6(4):452-9. PubMed ID: 4157344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Australian evaluation of Autobac I with suggested interpretive and technical modifications.
    Funnell GR, Guinness MD.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Sep; 16(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 389157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.