These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

130 related items for PubMed ID: 6787073

  • 21. Establishing quality control ranges for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus: a cornerstone to develop reference strains for Korean clinical microbiology laboratories.
    Hong SK, Choi SJ, Shin S, Lee W, Pinto N, Shin N, Lee K, Hong SG, Kim YA, Lee H, Kim H, Song W, Lee SH, Yong D, Lee K, Chong Y.
    Ann Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 35(6):635-8. PubMed ID: 26354353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Susceptibility testing quality control studies with fosfomycin tromethamine.
    Fuchs PC, Barry AL, Brown SD.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Jul; 16(7):538-40. PubMed ID: 9272392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Quality control of agar diffusion susceptibility tests. Data from the Quality Assurance Service Microbiology Program of the College of American Pathologists.
    Knowles RC, Moore TD.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Oct; 74(4 Suppl):581-5. PubMed ID: 6776805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Laboratory evaluation of amikacin susceptibility testing by the AutoBac I system.
    Boughton WH, Berman SJ, Boughton MT.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Mar; 9(3):397-8. PubMed ID: 457852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Reproducibility of control organism zone diameters for batches of IsoSensitest agar manufactured from 1996 to 2000 using the BSAC disc susceptibility test method.
    Landrygan J, James PA, Brooks D, Kubiak EM.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2002 Feb; 49(2):391-4. PubMed ID: 11815586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Performance evaluation of VITEK 2 system in meropenem susceptibility testing of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates].
    Acuner IC, Bayramoğlu G, Birinci A, Cekiç Cihan C, Bek Y, Durupınar B.
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jul; 45(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 21935774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Evaluation of disk diffusion test for carbapenem sensitivity in Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains].
    Akan OA, Uysal S.
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2005 Jul; 39(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 16358486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Two-hospital study of Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to penicillin and ampicillin by Autobac I.
    Harris PC, Sealey LB.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Dec; 18(6):922-5. PubMed ID: 7235678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Suitability of the ASM-2 standard test of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for evaluation of antimicrobial disk potency.
    Tardio JL, Westhoff D.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 6432834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. EUCAST evaluation of 21 brands of Mueller-Hinton dehydrated media for disc diffusion testing.
    Åhman J, Matuschek E, Kahlmeter G.
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2020 Oct; 26(10):1412.e1-1412.e5. PubMed ID: 32006695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Totally synthetic medium for susceptibility testing.
    Lawrence RM, Hoeprich PD.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Mar; 13(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 122521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Evaluation of the E test for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with long-term bladder catheterization.
    Di Bonaventura G, Ricci E, Della Loggia N, Catamo G, Piccolomini R.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):824-6. PubMed ID: 9508323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparison of five methods, including the PDM Epsilometer test (E test), for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Joyce LF, Downes J, Stockman K, Andrew JH.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Oct; 30(10):2709-13. PubMed ID: 1400972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Effect of different lots of Mueller-Hinton agar on the interpretation of the gentamicin susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Pollock HM, Minshew BH, Kenny MA, Schoenknecht FD.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Sep; 14(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 101130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Determination of Colistin Resistance by Simple Disk Diffusion Test Using Modified Mueller-Hinton Agar.
    Uwizeyimana JD, Kim D, Lee H, Byun JH, Yong D.
    Ann Lab Med; 2020 Jul; 40(4):306-311. PubMed ID: 32067429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Ability of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards-recommended quality control strains from the American Type Culture Collection to detect errors in disk diffusion susceptibility tests.
    Yechouron A, Dascal A, Stevenson J, Mendelson J.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Dec; 29(12):2758-62. PubMed ID: 1757546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Analysis of a single reference strain for determination of gentamicin regression line constants and inhibition zone diameter breakpoints in quality control of disk diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing.
    Kronvall G.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Nov; 16(5):784-93. PubMed ID: 6818249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Development of EUCAST zone diameter breakpoints and quality control criteria for ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 μg.
    Koeth LM, Matuschek E, Kahlmeter G, Stone G.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 Jun; 37(6):1047-1053. PubMed ID: 29603034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of different methods for determining beta-lactam susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Sapino B, Mazzuccato S, Solinas M, Gion M, Grandesso S.
    New Microbiol; 2012 Oct; 35(4):491-4. PubMed ID: 23109018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.