These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

192 related items for PubMed ID: 679697

  • 1. Lateral asymmetries in visual perception with and without eye movements.
    Jones B, Santi A.
    Cortex; 1978 Jun; 14(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 679697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of lateral visual fixation and the direction of eye movements on heartbeat discrimination.
    Weisz J, Balázs L, Láng E, Adám G.
    Psychophysiology; 1990 Sep; 27(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 2274615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reaction times and evoked potentials as indicators of hemispheric differences for laterally presented name and physical matches.
    Ledlow A, Swanson JM, Kinsbourne M.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Aug; 4(3):440-54. PubMed ID: 681891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Hemisphere differences in the effects of cuing in visual recognition tasks.
    Cohen C.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Nov; 1(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 1185123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Hemispheric representation of the central retina of commissurotomized subjects.
    Sugishita M, Hamilton CR, Sakuma I, Hemmi I.
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Apr; 32(4):399-415. PubMed ID: 8047248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Distinguishing subcortical and cortical influences in visual attention. Subcortical attentional processing.
    Zackon DH, Casson EJ, Stelmach L, Faubert J, Racette L.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 9040469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Are there different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual fields?
    Schwartz S, Montagner S, Kirsner K.
    Brain Lang; 1987 Jul; 31(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 3620904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Attentional factors in visual field asymmetries.
    Bryden MP, Mondor TA.
    Can J Psychol; 1991 Dec; 45(4):427-47. PubMed ID: 1777848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual-half-field stimuli.
    Hines D.
    Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 1149472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Manifestation of pathological inertia of fixation during perception of complex patterns.
    Kuz'mina TB, Vladimirov AD.
    Hum Physiol; 1983 Jun; 9(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 6678790
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Directional scanning and cerebral asymmetries in processing visual stimuli.
    Aaron PG, Handley AC.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Jun; 40(3):719-25. PubMed ID: 1178354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Hemispheric asymmetries in the recognition of animal photographs in different views.
    de-Mattos-Pimenta MA, Tiedemann KB.
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 1990 Jun; 23(11):1201-4. PubMed ID: 2133032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J, Holmqvist K, Lindgren M.
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Attentional bias and visual field asymmetry.
    Beaumont JG, Colley M.
    Cortex; 1980 Oct; 16(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 7214924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Orienting attention within visual fields: how efficient is interhemispheric transfer?
    Hardyck C, Chiarello C, Dronkers NF, Simpson GV.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Oct; 11(5):650-66. PubMed ID: 2932534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR, Patching GR.
    Neuropsychologia; 2004 Oct; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Rightward attentional bias and left hemisphere dominance in a cue-target light detection task in a callosotomy patient.
    Berlucchi G, Aglioti S, Tassinari G.
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Jul; 35(7):941-52. PubMed ID: 9226656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Horizontal or vertical optokinetic stimulation activates visual motion-sensitive, ocular motor and vestibular cortex areas with right hemispheric dominance. An fMRI study.
    Dieterich M, Bucher SF, Seelos KC, Brandt T.
    Brain; 1998 Aug; 121 ( Pt 8)():1479-95. PubMed ID: 9712010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Activity of inferior temporal neurons in behaving monkeys.
    Gross CG, Bender DB, Gerstein GL.
    Neuropsychologia; 1979 Aug; 17(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 111157
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Right hemisphere superiority in the perception of different kinds of non-verbal material.
    Sobótka S, Grabowska AM.
    Physiol Bohemoslov; 1985 Aug; 34 Suppl():149-52. PubMed ID: 2941785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.