These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
128 related items for PubMed ID: 6808910
1. Agar disk diffusion for the quality control testing of Autobac elution disks. Gaydos JM, Harrington BJ. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Mar; 21(3):516-8. PubMed ID: 6808910 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Alternative quality control parameters for Autobac susceptibility testing disks: use of agar diffusion zone size results. Boshard R, Matsen JM. J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):814-7. PubMed ID: 6787073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Suitability of the ASM-2 standard test of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for evaluation of antimicrobial disk potency. Tardio JL, Westhoff D. J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 6432834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality control limits for the agar overlay disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility test. Barry AL, Badal RE. J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Dec; 16(6):1145-7. PubMed ID: 7161377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality control in antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing: a Belgian multicenter study. Lauwers S, Philippe J, Van Zeebroeck A, Pierard D, Derde MP, Kaufman L. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991 Aug; 10(8):652-6. PubMed ID: 1748119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Examination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-gentamicin discrepancies encountered in an Autobac I-disk diffusion comparison. Mayo JB, Kiehn TE, Wong B, Bernard EM, Armstrong D. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Mar; 21(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 6808909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Interlaboratory quality control of the agar diffusion test for determining sensitivity of microorganisms to antibiotics]. Garanina EN, Givental' NI, Andreeva ZM, Verenchikova IaV, Ginzburg AI. Lab Delo; 1984 Mar; (1):43-6. PubMed ID: 6199568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study. Thornsberry C, Gavan TL, Sherris JC, Balows A, Matsen JM, Sabath LD, Schoenknecht F, Thrupp LD, Washington JA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1975 Apr; 7(4):466-80. PubMed ID: 1147582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility test results: how guilty a laboratory could be? Nassar MSM, Hazzah WA, Bakr WMK. J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 2019 Apr; 94(1):4. PubMed ID: 30686832 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of agar depth on antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disc diffusion. Olaru ID, Schoeler S, Schaumburg F. J Med Microbiol; 2024 Sep; 73(9):. PubMed ID: 39292220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cefoperazone disk diffusion susceptibility test: confirmation of the tentative interpretive criteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-resistance, and determination of quality control performance limits. Jones RN, Gavan TL, Barry AL, Thornsberry C, Gibbs DL. J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):777-86. PubMed ID: 6212596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of two standardized disk methods for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and of the Enterobacteriaceae. Barry AL, Effinger LJ. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1974 Oct; 6(4):452-9. PubMed ID: 4157344 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Australian evaluation of Autobac I with suggested interpretive and technical modifications. Funnell GR, Guinness MD. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Sep; 16(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 389157 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]