These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

190 related items for PubMed ID: 681196

  • 1. Masking of spondees by interrupted noise in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Punch JL.
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(6):245-52. PubMed ID: 681196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V, Molis MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
    Wilson RH, McArdle R, Betancourt MB, Herring K, Lipton T, Chisolm TH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception.
    Lorenzi C, Husson M, Ardoint M, Debruille X.
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):487-95. PubMed ID: 17005491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Clinical study of speech understanding in noise].
    Tremblay C, Picard M, Barbarosie T, Banville R.
    Audiology; 1991 Sep; 30(4):212-40. PubMed ID: 1755750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS, Lyzenga J, Dreschler WA, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions.
    Emiroglu S, Kollmeier B.
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul 18; 1220():199-207. PubMed ID: 17991457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D, Jourdes V, Lorenzi C.
    Hear Res; 2008 May 18; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL, Goverts ST, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec 18; 53(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 20689027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM, Plomp R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct 18; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.