These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

117 related items for PubMed ID: 6829737

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. High click stimulus repetition rate in the auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients with normal MRI. Does it improve diagnosis?
    Santos MA, Munhoz MS, Peixoto MA, Silva CS.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15605430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Auditory brain stem responses (ABR) in cat. Latency as a function of stimulus polarity, intensity and acoustic waveform.
    Tvete O, Haugsten P.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():35-8. PubMed ID: 6944776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Evaluation of the effect of auditory fatigue on the human ear based on the measurement of brain stem auditory potentials (ABR). II. Relation of temporary auditory threshold shift and changes in the latency of wave V].
    Janczewski G, Kochanek K, Dawidowicz J, Dobrzyński P, Checiński P.
    Med Pr; 1988; 39(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 3226285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: early latency components.
    Sims MH, Moore RE.
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2019-27. PubMed ID: 6497099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Evaluation of the effect of auditory fatigue on the human ear by auditory brain stem responses (ABR). I. Effect of auditory fatigue on temporary threshold shifts of ABR].
    Janczewski G, Kochanek K, Dawidowicz J, Dobrzyński P, Checiński P.
    Med Pr; 1988 Oct; 39(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 3210960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Direct comparison between properties of adaptation of the auditory nerve and the ventral cochlear nucleus in response to repetitive clicks.
    Meyer K, Rouiller EM, Loquet G.
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):144-55. PubMed ID: 17391881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Brainstem response (ABR) to rarefaction and condensation clicks in normal hearing and steep high-frequency hearing loss.
    Borg E, Löfqvist L.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981 Jun; 13():99-101. PubMed ID: 6944785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Brain stem auditory-evoked responses in the dog.
    Bodenhamer RD, Hunter JF, Luttgen PJ.
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Aug; 46(8):1787-92. PubMed ID: 4037510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Middle latency auditory evoked responses in normal term infants: a longitudinal study.
    Rogers SH, Edwards DA, Henderson-Smart DJ, Pettigrew AG.
    Neuropediatrics; 1989 May; 20(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 2739875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Auditory brainstem responses from human adults and infants: influence of stimulus onset.
    Folsom RC, Aurich CD.
    Audiology; 1987 May; 26(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 3606471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The influence of unilateral versus bilateral clicks on the vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials.
    Huang TW, Cheng PW, Su HC.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 16436989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of stimulus polarity on far-field auditory-evoked electrical responses in the chick.
    Brown-Borg HM, Beck MM, Jones TA.
    J Aud Res; 1986 Oct; 26(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 3436924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.