These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

102 related items for PubMed ID: 6846495

  • 1. The bead test: a critical appraisal.
    Richman JE, Garzia RP.
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1983 Mar; 60(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 6846495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Using the KM visual acuity chart for more reliable evaluation of amblyopia compared to the HVOT method.
    Moutakis K, Stigmar G, Hall-Lindberg J.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Oct; 82(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 15453851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
    Elliott MC, Firth AY.
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of tests to determine acuity deficits in children with amblyopia.
    Geer I, Westall CA.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Sep; 16(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 8944181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
    Laidlaw DA, Tailor V, Shah N, Atamian S, Harcourt C.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Comparative assessment of visual acuity in preschoolers].
    Tatarinov SA, Dubovskaia LA, Kovalevskiĭ EI, Fil'chikova LI, Matveev SG.
    Oftalmol Zh; 1988 Feb; (7):387-90. PubMed ID: 3237361
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Preliminary note on the application to amblyopia of the dynamic exploration of visual acuity].
    Bessière E, Rougier-Houssin, Quinton, Verin P.
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1965 Nov; 65(11):1036-40. PubMed ID: 5866220
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
    Brown SM.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 138(3):512; author reply 512-3. PubMed ID: 15364255
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.