These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

269 related items for PubMed ID: 6850104

  • 21. Psychiatric ethics in the courtroom.
    Appelbaum PS.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 6478064
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Forensic practice between commonality, the law and psychiatry. 2].
    Hoffmann-Richter U, Dittmann V.
    Psychiatr Prax; 1996 May; 23(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 8711011
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. How should forensic psychiatry police itself? Guidelines and grievances: the AAPL Committee on Ethics.
    Weinstein HC.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984 May; 12(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 6478071
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Mentally disordered offenders and the insanity verdict.
    Norton WA.
    Can J Psychiatry; 1989 Jun; 34(5):478-80. PubMed ID: 2766200
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Practical ethical problems of the forensic psychiatrist in dealing with attorneys.
    Sadoff RL.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984 Jun; 12(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 6478067
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D, Janofsky J, Keram E, Lawsky S, Merideth P, Mossman D, Schwart-Watts D, Scott C, Thompson J, Zonana H, American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002 Jun; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Psychological structure as a guiding principle in forensic practice].
    Janzarik W.
    Nervenarzt; 1993 Jul; 64(7):427-33. PubMed ID: 8366970
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Leaving the scene of an accident--a special offense in forensic psychiatric assessment?].
    Barbey I.
    Blutalkohol; 1992 Jul; 29(4):252-64. PubMed ID: 1503704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Some problems in forensic assessment].
    Schlegel J, Amboss M.
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov; 40(11):641-6. PubMed ID: 3237869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Forensic psychiatrists' and psychologists' understanding of insanity: misguided expertise?
    Rogers R, Turner RE, Helfield R, Dickens S.
    Can J Psychiatry; 1988 Nov; 33(8):691-5. PubMed ID: 3203269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The psychiatrist in court.
    Grounds A.
    Br J Hosp Med; 1985 Jul; 34(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 4016412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The insanity defence: from wild beasts to M'Naghten.
    Allnutt S, Samuels A, O'driscoll C.
    Australas Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 15(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 17612881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The insanity defense: why it should be retained.
    Sadoff RL.
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1977 Jun; 5(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 301165
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [The myth of the lucid interval. Evaluation of testability].
    Rasch W, Bayerl R.
    Lebensversicher Med; 1985 Jan 01; 37(1):2, 4, 6-8. PubMed ID: 2858044
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Forensic-psychologic-psychiatric assessment from the viewpoint of perpetrators--data from a survey].
    Littmann E.
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov 01; 40(11):655-64. PubMed ID: 3237871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Dissection of the prongs of ALI. A retrospective assessment of criminal responsibility by the psychiatric staff of the Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center.
    Silver SB, Spodak MK.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983 Nov 01; 11(4):383-91. PubMed ID: 6661569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Further comments on the insanity defense in the aftermath of the Hinckley trial.
    Halpern AL.
    Psychiatr Q; 1984 Nov 01; 56(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 6522530
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Development of modern classification systems and their effects on forensic psychiatric expert assessment].
    Krupinski M.
    Gesundheitswesen; 1994 Dec 01; 56(12):652-6. PubMed ID: 7841673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Problem of a test method assessment of simulation and dissimulation in forensic expert testimony].
    Szegedi M.
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1986 Dec 01; 36(2):298-300. PubMed ID: 2979386
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Court experts, assessors and the public interest.
    Freckelton I.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986 Dec 01; 8(2):161-88. PubMed ID: 3957522
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.