These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

349 related items for PubMed ID: 6857508

  • 1. Above-knee polytetrafluoroethylene femoropopliteal bypass graft: Is it a reasonable alternative to the below-knee reversed autogenous vein graft?
    O'Donnell TF, Farber SP, Richmand DM, Deterling RA, Callow AD.
    Surgery; 1983 Jul; 94(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 6857508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Femoropopliteal bypass for claudication: vein vs. PTFE.
    Allen BT, Reilly JM, Rubin BG, Thompson RW, Anderson CB, Flye MW, Sicard GA.
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1996 Mar; 10(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 8733871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery.
    Ambler GK, Twine CP.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Feb 11; 2(2):CD001487. PubMed ID: 29429146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The consequences of a failed femoropopliteal bypass grafting: comparison of saphenous vein and PTFE grafts.
    Jackson MR, Belott TP, Dickason T, Kaiser WJ, Modrall JG, Valentine RJ, Clagett GP.
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep 11; 32(3):498-504; 504-5. PubMed ID: 10957656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparative evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene, umbilical vein, and saphenous vein bypass grafts for femoral-popliteal above-knee revascularization: a prospective randomized Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study.
    Johnson WC, Lee KK.
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Aug 11; 32(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 10917986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Distal femoropopliteal bypass using a composite graft of PTFE and non-reversed saphenous vein.
    Holdsworth PJ, Riddell PS, Leveson SH.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jan 11; 71(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 2923418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Broad variation in prosthetic conduit use for femoral-popliteal bypass is not justified on the basis of contemporary outcomes favoring autologous great saphenous vein.
    Humbarger O, Siracuse JJ, Rybin D, Stone DH, Goodney PP, Schermerhorn ML, Farber A, Jones DW, Vascular Quality Initiative.
    J Vasc Surg; 2019 Nov 11; 70(5):1514-1523.e2. PubMed ID: 31147137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Heparin-bonded ePTFE grafts compared with vein grafts in femoropopliteal and femorocrural bypasses: 1- and 2-year results.
    Daenens K, Schepers S, Fourneau I, Houthoofd S, Nevelsteen A.
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 May 11; 49(5):1210-6. PubMed ID: 19394550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.