These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma. Walsh JW, Goplerud DR. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Nov; 137(5):997-1003. PubMed ID: 6975028 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Interobserver variability of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging in cervical cancer. Tummers P, Gerestein K, Mens JW, Verstraelen H, van Doorn H. Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jun; 23(5):890-4. PubMed ID: 23640293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The evaluation of transrectal radial ultrasonography on parametrial infiltration in untreated cervical carcinoma for more accurate staging. Yamamoto K, Kitao M. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 41(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 2664041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumor heterogeneity of FIGO stage III carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Kim YB, Lee IJ, Kim SY, Kim JW, Yoon HI, Kim SW, Kim S, Kim YT, Suh CO, Kim GE. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec 01; 75(5):1323-8. PubMed ID: 19467800 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of cystoscopy and intravenous urography after magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma. Chung H, Ahn HS, Kim YS, Lee EJ, Ryu HS, Chang KH, Kim SJ. Yonsei Med J; 2001 Oct 01; 42(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 11675681 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]