These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
339 related items for PubMed ID: 6889050
21. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives. Ciulla JB. Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Backsliding on "Baby Doe"? Med World News; 1985 Mar 11; 26(5):11, 15. PubMed ID: 10317572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ, Balch BJ. Linacre Q; 1985 Feb 11; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The federal role in protecting Babies Doe. Gerry MH, Nimz M. Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar 11; 2(5):339-77. PubMed ID: 2954927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Neonatologists and bioethics after Baby Doe. Carter BS. J Perinatol; 1993 Mar 11; 13(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 8515309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The final, anticlimactic rule on Baby Doe. Murray TH. Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Jun 11; 15(3):5-9. PubMed ID: 4019172 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Confusion over the language of the Baby Doe regulations. Bermel J. Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec 11; 16(6):2. PubMed ID: 11643944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Medical groups' suit seeks to put legal padlock on 'Baby Doe' reg. Gibbons DL. Med World News; 1984 Apr 09; 25(7):19, 23. PubMed ID: 10267469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. What ever happened to Baby Jane...Doe? Jolly CM. West State Univ Law Rev; 1987 Apr 09; 14(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 11651891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Medical decision-making for defective infants by the Federal government. Taub S. Conn Med; 1983 Jul 09; 47(7):413-6. PubMed ID: 6224633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Putting hospitals on notice. Fost N. Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Aug 09; 12(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 6215343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Establishing decision making standards for medical treatment to protect the civil rights of handicapped newborns. Glasow SB. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986 Aug 09; 2():255-74. PubMed ID: 10317803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The case of Baby Jane Doe. 2. Baby Jane Doe in the courts. Steinbock B. Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb 09; 14(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6232243 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey. Sarno JJ. Seton Hall Legis J; 1987 Feb 09; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Health care groups favor local 'Baby Doe' review. Med World News; 1983 Sep 26; 24(18):9. PubMed ID: 11645497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Medical ethics in life and death. Thompson R. Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb 24; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Ethical dilemmas in the treatment of critically ill newborns. Brooks BF. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985 Feb 24; 1(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 10280374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Disconnecting the Baby Doe hotline. Annas GJ. Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Jun 24; 13(3):14-6. PubMed ID: 6224760 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions. Nicholson EB, Horowitz RM, Parry J, American Bar Association. Commission on the Mentally Disabled, American Bar Association. National Legal Resource Center for Child Advocacy and Protection. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986 Jun 24; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]