These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
40 related items for PubMed ID: 6892831
1. A reaction-time analysis of electrocochlear stimulation in cats. Walloch RA, Fenwick JA, Boberg R. Laryngoscope; 1980 May; 90(5 Pt 1):861-6. PubMed ID: 6892831 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation. Carlyon RP, van Wieringen A, Deeks JM, Long CJ, Lyzenga J, Wouters J. Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing. van Wieringen A, Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Wouters J. Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current. Cohen LT. Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids. Davidson LS. Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects. Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA. Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 18692122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates. Laback B, Majdak P. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan 15; 105(2):814-7. PubMed ID: 18182489 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration. Fu QJ. Hear Res; 2005 Apr 15; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reaction time to 1- and 4-kHz tones as a function of sensation level in listeners with normal hearing. Epstein M, Florentine M. Ear Hear; 2006 Aug 15; 27(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 16825891 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities. Lange K, Röder B. J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May 15; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of intensity and location on sound location discrimination in macaque monkeys. Recanzone GH, Beckerman NS. Hear Res; 2004 Dec 15; 198(1-2):116-24. PubMed ID: 15567608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes. Schröger E. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov 15; 100(6):517-26. PubMed ID: 8980416 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The interstimulus interval in classical autonomic conditioning of young infants. Ingram EM. Dev Psychobiol; 1978 Sep 15; 11(5):419-26. PubMed ID: 689293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]