These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

137 related items for PubMed ID: 6895542

  • 1. Four years of experience with cochlear prostheses.
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, Burian K, Fischer RE.
    Med Prog Technol; 1981; 8(3):107-19. PubMed ID: 6895542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Vienna cochlear implant program.
    Burian K, Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Eisenwort B.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 3754952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.
    Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackmann DE, Mladejovsky MG, Parkin JL.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978 May; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 736424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The cochlear implant; basic principles.
    Brackmann DE.
    Laryngoscope; 1976 Mar; 86(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 1256212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A, Brenner C, Davidson L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. UCH/RNID single channel extracochlear implant: results in thirty profoundly deafened adults.
    Cooper HR, Carpenter L, Aleksy W, Booth CL, Read TE, Graham JM, Fraser JG.
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989 Oct; 18():22-38. PubMed ID: 2607192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Experiences in Kiel with the cochlear implant].
    Müller-Deile J, Schmidt BJ, Rudert H.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Jun; 73(6):300-10. PubMed ID: 8060448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Results of a preliminary clinical trial on a multiple channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Dowell RC, Martin LF, Clark GM, Brown AM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1985 Jun; 94(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 3160295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation.
    Higgins MB, McCleary EA, Carney AE, Schulte L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 12598813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [History of the development and functional description of the Nucleus cochlear implant].
    Maltan AA.
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1994 Feb; 144(1-2):29-33. PubMed ID: 8197760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Is psychological status a determinant of speech perception outcomes in highly selected good adolescent cochlear implant users?
    Yucel E, Sennaroglu G.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1415-22. PubMed ID: 17586056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ, Skinner MW, Martin LF, Holden LK, Galvin KL, Holden TA, Whitford L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor.
    Lawson DT, Wilson BS, Zerbi M, van den Honert C, Finley CC, Farmer JC, McElveen JT, Roush PA.
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 9831150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H, Cozma S, Boutitie F, Disant F, Truy E, Collet L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [The characteristics of hearing perception in light of the problem of rehabilitating patients who have undergone implantation].
    Lantsov AA, Petrov SM, Pudov VI.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1998 Mar; (4):9-11. PubMed ID: 9752087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 15148189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Considerations on the rehabilitation of the hearing in cochlear implant patients].
    Amadori M, Pantano N, Cestaro A, Babighian G.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1996 Aug; 16(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9082826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Hildesheimer M, Muchnik C.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.