These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Restoration of auditory nerve synapses in cats by cochlear implants. Ryugo DK, Kretzmer EA, Niparko JK. Science; 2005 Dec 02; 310(5753):1490-2. PubMed ID: 16322457 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs. Skarzyński H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Podskarbi-Fayette R. Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Dec 02; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An animal model for cochlear implants. Kretzmer EA, Meltzer NE, Haenggeli CA, Ryugo DK. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May 02; 130(5):499-508. PubMed ID: 15148168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Dynamics of the harmonic components of the cochlear microphonic potential during acoustic overloading and exposure to ototoxic substances]. Sagalovich BM, Malinkin VB. Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1980 Apr 02; 66(4):508-14. PubMed ID: 7389940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug 02; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [A model for the study of the ototoxic effects of drugs in an experiment]. Fisenko VP, Guseĭnov NM. Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1996 Aug 02; (1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8714047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Optimization of the electrostimulation parameters for cochlear implantation]. D'iakonova IN, Tikhomirov AM. Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 1994 Nov 02; 80(11):76-81. PubMed ID: 7536562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pitch matching of electric and acoustic stimuli. Blamey PJ, Parisi ES, Clark GM. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep 02; 166():220-2. PubMed ID: 7668645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cochlear implantation in chronic experiments]. Fitenko LN, D'iakonova IN, Bogomil'skiĭ MR, Tikhomirov AM, Rakhmanova IV. Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1986 Sep 02; (6):22-6. PubMed ID: 3811110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Characteristics of electroacoustic correction in various forms of experimental disorders of acoustic sensitivity]. Tokarev OP, Kruglov AV. Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1984 Sep 02; (1):14-7. PubMed ID: 6546627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Implantation on the cochlear nucleus. Apropos of a patient with bilateral neuroma]. Laszig R, Sollmann WP, Charachon R, Lavieille JP, Marangos N. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994 Sep 02; 111(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 7785929 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates. Laback B, Majdak P. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan 15; 105(2):814-7. PubMed ID: 18182489 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Kelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR. Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun 15; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Event-related potentials with selected electrodes of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. Ash KR, Shallop JK. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep 15; 166():163-5. PubMed ID: 7668617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality standards for combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Hagen R. Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun 15; 14 Suppl 2():S27-33. PubMed ID: 23764329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Auditory evoked potentials by electric stimulation of the cochlea]. Sarfati D, Bestry C, Moatti L, Garabedian EN. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994 Jun 15; 111(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 7645888 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]