These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Bilateral tachistoscopic word recognition as a function of hemisphere stimulated and interhemispheric transfer time. McKeever WF, Huling MD. Neuropsychologia; 1971 Sep; 9(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 5149299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Asymmetry of the cerebral hemispheres during comparison of paired visual stimuli]. Udalova GP, Kashina IA. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1985 Sep; 35(3):420-7. PubMed ID: 4036318 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Does post-exposural directional scanning offer a sufficient explanation for lateral differences in tachistoscopic recognition? McKeever WF. Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 4815516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Hemispheric differences in the discrimination of curvature. Longden K, Ellis C, Iversen SD. Neuropsychologia; 1976 Feb; 14(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 934453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Lateral dominance in tachistoscopic word recognition performances obtained with simultaneous bilateral input. McKeever WF, Hulling MD. Neuropsychologia; 1971 Mar; 9(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 4336397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Left and right visual field superiority for letter classification. Jonides J. Q J Exp Psychol; 1979 Aug; 31(3):423-39. PubMed ID: 504547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Right visual field superiority for letter recognition with partial report. Hirata K, Bryden MP. Can J Psychol; 1976 Sep; 30(3):134-9. PubMed ID: 1000405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Interhemispheric differences in the spatial-frequency description of images and the consequences for visual recognition]. Nevskaia AA, Leushina LI. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1990 Sep; 40(5):915-24. PubMed ID: 1964337 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Laterality differences in tachistoscopic word recognition in normal and delayed readers in elementary school. Olson ME. Neuropsychologia; 1973 Jul; 11(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 4792185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Functional dissociation of the hemispheres using foveal visual input. Haun F. Neuropsychologia; 1978 Jul; 16(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 748809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cerebral dominance in disabled readers, good readers, and gifted children: search for a valid model. Kershner JR. Child Dev; 1977 Mar; 48(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 844362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Dominance of a hemisphere and optical perception with tachistoscope examination]. Deegener G. Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1974 Apr; 26(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 4848523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Phenomenon of pseudolocalization of a visual pattern and functional asymmetry of the human brain. Yarlykov VN. Hum Physiol; 1984 Apr; 10(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 6544718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]