These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

147 related items for PubMed ID: 6960720

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: Activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Baltromejus S, Ruf S, Pancherz H.
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Dec; 24(6):627-37. PubMed ID: 12512780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. A cephalometric, tomographic, and dental cast evaluation of Fränkel therapy.
    Hamilton SD, Sinclair PM, Hamilton RH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Nov; 92(5):427-36. PubMed ID: 3479011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study.
    Jakobsson SO, Paulin G.
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 2351202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Does the mandible alter its functional position during activator treatment?
    Thüer U, Ingervall B, Bürgin W.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Dec; 96(6):477-84. PubMed ID: 2589258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling.
    Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Sep; 92(3):181-98. PubMed ID: 3477085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Vargervik K, Harvold EP.
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 3862347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Arch width development in Class II patients treated with the Fränkel appliance.
    McDougall PD, McNamara JA, Dierkes JM.
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 82(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 6760718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.
    Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Feb; 85(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 6594053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.