These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

370 related items for PubMed ID: 6963773

  • 1. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R, Martin CA, Dischinger T, Razmus T, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Herbst appliance--its biologic effects and clinical use.
    Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Jan; 87(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 3855346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
    Martin J, Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
    Pancherz H, Malmgren O, Hägg U, Omblus J, Hansen K.
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance].
    Schiavoni R.
    Mondo Ortod; 1990 Feb; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Pancherz H, Hägg U.
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 3863486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Post-treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. A radiographic, clinical and biometric investigation.
    Hansen K.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1992 Oct; 88():1-49. PubMed ID: 1492308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Oct; 76(4):423-42. PubMed ID: 291343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR, Sinclair PM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG, Dischinger T, Martin C, Razmus T, Gunel E, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    McNamara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Pancherz H, Fackel U.
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 2351206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Windmiller EC.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. An evidence-based approach to treatment of open bite and deep bite: case reports.
    Hans MG, Teng CM, Liao CC, Chen YH, Yang CY.
    World J Orthod; 2007 Jul; 8(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 17373225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY, Sampson WJ, Townsend GC, Hughes T.
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of the Herbst appliance in growing orthodontic patients with different underlying vertical patterns.
    Deen E, Woods MG.
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 26219148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Dentaoalveolar changes in young adult patients with class II/1 malocclusion treated with the herbst appliance and an activator].
    Nedeljković N, Sćepan I, Glisić B, Marković E.
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Feb; 67(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 20337101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An assessment of Andresen therapy on class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Calvert FJ.
    Br J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 9(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6954989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.