These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 6974541

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Beta-lactamase-positive strains of Haemophilus influenzae: susceptibility to and inactivation of beta-lactam antibiotics.
    Anderson EL, Robinson PA, Tu KK, Adams CR.
    South Med J; 1985 Jun; 78(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 3873708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. In vitro antimicrobial activity of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, moxalactam (LY127935), azlocillin, mezlocillin, and other beta-lactam antibiotics against Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus influenzae, including beta-lactamase-producing strains.
    Baker CN, Thornsberry C, Jones RN.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Apr; 17(4):757-61. PubMed ID: 6249195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The taxonomy and antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus species in clinical specimens.
    Golberg R, Washington JA.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1978 Dec; 70(6):899-904. PubMed ID: 364976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Activities of newer beta-lactam antibiotics against ampicillin, chloramphenicol, or multiply-resistant Haemophilus influenzae.
    Strandberg DA, Jorgensen JH, Drutz DJ.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1984 Sep; 2(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 6333316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Rapid method for determining antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae.
    Smith JA, Ngui-Yen JH, Fothergill J, Porter D.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Nov; 16(5):832-5. PubMed ID: 6984049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to antimicrobial agents used in Canada. Canadian Study Group.
    Tremblay LD, L'Ecuyer J, Provencher P, Bergeron MG.
    CMAJ; 1990 Nov 01; 143(9):895-901. PubMed ID: 2224717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparative susceptibility of Haemophilus species to cefaclor, cefamandole, and five other cephalosporins and ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline.
    Watanakunakorn C, Glotzbecker C.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Jun 01; 15(6):836-8. PubMed ID: 258112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Susceptibility of ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae to seven penicillins.
    Thornsberry C, Baker CN, Kirven LA, Swenson JM.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Jan 01; 9(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 1083202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In vitro activity of second and third generation cephalosporins against ampicillin susceptible and resistant haemophilus influenzae.
    Burns JL, Wong K, Smith AL.
    Infection; 1988 Jan 01; 16(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 3265130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.