These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 6992099

  • 1. [Comparison of Micro-ID, API 20 E and a conventional technique for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Gregersen T, Persson B, Jensen MM.
    Nord Vet Med; 1980 May; 32(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 6992099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D, Gavini F, Ochin D, Enayeh E, Leclerc H.
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Dec; 28(10):681-4. PubMed ID: 7008005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Micro-ID system (author's transl)].
    Peuckert W, Pelz K.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Aug; 247(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 6999799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Identification of Gram negative rods and evaluation of their antibiotic sensitivity: comparison of the BIOTEST MHK/ID-system with the API 20E-system and the agar diffusion test].
    Stanek G, Hirschl A, Rotter M.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Oct; 253(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 6817546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of Micro-ID, a modified Minitek system, and conventional methods for four-hour identification of Enterobacteriacae directly from blood cultures.
    Wellstood S.
    Am J Med Technol; 1982 Sep; 48(9):769-73. PubMed ID: 6753582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of enteric identification systems.
    Borchardt KA, Gibson J.
    Health Lab Sci; 1977 Jan; 14(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 319082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the MIC 2000 enteric media with API 20 E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Courcol RJ, Husson MO, Izard DE, Martin GR.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Sep; 252(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 6758421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Use of microsystems for the identification of Enterbacteria in the microbiological laboratory: comments on technics and identification procedures].
    Ottaviani F, Aliani A, Benetti L, Viero B.
    Ann Sclavo; 1976 Sep; 18(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 800723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Comparison of two systems for identifying coliform enterobacteria newly described or rarely found in clinical practice].
    Renaud F, Freney J, Gavini F, Boeufgras JM, Fleurette J.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1990 Sep; 48(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 2188531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae: evaluation of 3 commercial systems].
    Sala A, Dore R, Raffaele L, Cappello P.
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1985 Jun; 21(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 4080964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Use of the API 20E system to identify non-Enterobacteriaceae from veterinary medical sources.
    Collins MT, Swanson EC.
    Am J Vet Res; 1981 Jul; 42(7):1269-73. PubMed ID: 7023301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [An evaluation of the PATHOTEC system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae (author's tranls)].
    Gregersen T, Halgaard C.
    Nord Vet Med; 1976 Jun; 28(6):316-21. PubMed ID: 781615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Gooch WM, Hill GA.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):885-90. PubMed ID: 7047556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D, Savage C, Enayeh E, Leclerc H, Troonen H.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.
    Edberg SC, Atkinson B, Chambers C, Moore MH, Palumbo L, Zorzon CF, Singer JM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 389946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Kelly MT, Latimer JM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Aldridge KE, Gardner BB, Clark SJ, Matsen JM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 353065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.
    O'Hara CM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.