These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

169 related items for PubMed ID: 6995148

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Grant recipients' rights in question.
    Willson PD.
    Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Abortion debate continues: a look at laws, regulations, restrictions and funding.
    Smith JA.
    Calif Nurse; 1980 Jun; 76(1):8. PubMed ID: 6991059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Subsidized family planning services in Texas.
    Mondy LW.
    Tex Med; 1982 Nov; 78(11):58-62. PubMed ID: 6897461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. 80 percent of Americans believe abortion should be legal; 70 percent approve Medicaid Funding.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1979 Nov; 11(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 383496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Public funding of contraceptive services, 1980-1982.
    Nestor B.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1982 Nov; 14(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 6811312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The Supreme Court and abortion: 2. Sidestepping social realities.
    Mechanic D.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 7007284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The Medicaid cutoff and abortion services for the poor.
    Henshaw SK, Wallisch LS.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1984 Dec; 16(4):171-2, 177-80. PubMed ID: 6386517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The provision of public-sector services by family planning agencies in 1995.
    Frost JJ, Bolzan M.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1997 Dec; 29(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 9119045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Medicaid coverage of abortions in New York City: costs and benefits.
    Robinson M, Pakter J, Svigir M.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1974 Dec; 6(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 4216513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Public-sector savings resulting from expenditures for contraceptive services.
    Forrest JD, Singh S.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1990 Dec; 22(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 2108877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. State abortion policy, geographic access to abortion providers and changing family formation.
    Lichter DT, McLaughlin DK, Ribar DC.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998 Dec; 30(6):281-7. PubMed ID: 9859019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.