These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

168 related items for PubMed ID: 6997011

  • 21. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S, Gilpatrick RO, Moore D.
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Comparative clinical study of amalgam fillings].
    Szabó J, Herczegh B, Márk D, Tóth E, Bánóczy J.
    Fogorv Sz; 1998 Oct; 91(8-9):285-91. PubMed ID: 9729672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Comparative scanning electron microscopic studies on the width of the marginal cleft of various composites and on the accuracy of reproduction of the clefts with various casting materials].
    Seichter U, Herforth A.
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 6931814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Further study of restored and un-restored teeth subjected to high temperatures.
    Merlati G, Savlo C, Danesino P, Fassina G, Menghini P.
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2004 Dec; 22(2):34-9. PubMed ID: 16223018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Scanning electron microscopic study of so-called carvable composite filling materials after over one-year functional period].
    Triadan H.
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Mar; 89(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 117547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Use of amalgam versus composite resins for fillings in molar teeth].
    Shikai Tenbo; 1985 Dec; 66(6):1313-24. PubMed ID: 3868830
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy.
    Shaini FJ, Wahab FK, Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Fleming GJ, Marquis PM.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
    Paolantonio M, D'ercole S, Perinetti G, Tripodi D, Catamo G, Serra E, Bruè C, Piccolomini R.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Comparative study on the abrasion behavior of composite filling materials].
    Soltész U, Klaiber B, Pergande C, Richter H.
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1979 May; 34(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 288560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum.
    Demarco FF, Ramos OL, Mota CS, Formolo E, Justino LM.
    Oper Dent; 2001 May; 26(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11357567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A, Hintze H, Hørsted-Bindslev P.
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Coronal microleakage of temporary restorations in previously restored teeth with amalgam and composite.
    Tulunoglu O, Uçtasli MB, Ozdemir S.
    Oper Dent; 2005 Jun; 30(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 15986953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K, Ministry of Health.
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Mar; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Clinical comparison of 3 composite resins with amalgam in the region of the posterior teeth].
    Roulet JF.
    ZWR; 1977 Nov 10; 86(21):1055-62. PubMed ID: 337725
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations.
    Full CA, Hollander WR.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993 Nov 10; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN, Machado A, Van Noort R, Ritter AV, Baratieri NM.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Nov 10; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Composites versus amalgam: comparative measurements of abrasion resistance in vivo: 1-year results].
    Meier C, Lutz F.
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Mar 10; 89(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 293032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Evaluation of the marginal sealing capacity of composite and conventional materials for filling of tissue defects; in vitro studies].
    Wasik A, Bobowicz Z.
    Protet Stomatol; 1977 Mar 10; 27(2):175. PubMed ID: 270176
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.