These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

173 related items for PubMed ID: 6999781

  • 1. [Comparison of API-10s and Minitek with conventional biochemical tests (author's transl)].
    Stanek G, Hirschl A, Rotter M.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Feb; 246(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 6999781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Micro-ID system (author's transl)].
    Peuckert W, Pelz K.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Aug; 247(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 6999799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P, Carbone M, Fera MT, Teti G.
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983 Aug; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of enteric identification systems.
    Borchardt KA, Gibson J.
    Health Lab Sci; 1977 Jan; 14(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 319082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of Minitec and API as rapid diagnostic methods for anaerobic bacteria.
    Bergan T, Vangdal M, Salveson A.
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1984 Jan; 91():103-11. PubMed ID: 6377470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D, Gavini F, Ochin D, Enayeh E, Leclerc H.
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Dec; 28(10):681-4. PubMed ID: 7008005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Evaluation of two miniaturized systems widely used in the laboratories for the identification of the "Enterobacteriaceae" (author's transl)].
    Santini GF, Crovatto M, Chiaradia V, Marchi MP.
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1979 Mar; 15(1):78-102. PubMed ID: 396548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D, Savage C, Enayeh E, Leclerc H, Troonen H.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Identification of Gram negative rods and evaluation of their antibiotic sensitivity: comparison of the BIOTEST MHK/ID-system with the API 20E-system and the agar diffusion test].
    Stanek G, Hirschl A, Rotter M.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Oct; 253(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 6817546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin.
    Kulinich LI, Fish NG, Mazitova OP, Dratvin SA, Birger MO.
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987 Oct; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the Minitek test system with a conventional screening procedure for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Hanson CW, Marso E, Martin WJ.
    Health Lab Sci; 1978 Jan; 15(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 346535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the MIC 2000 enteric media with API 20 E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Courcol RJ, Husson MO, Izard DE, Martin GR.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Sep; 252(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 6758421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae: evaluation of 3 commercial systems].
    Sala A, Dore R, Raffaele L, Cappello P.
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1985 Jun; 21(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 4080964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of the MicroScan system for identification of staphylococci.
    Sáa AI, Vivas J, Tinajas A, Barbeyto L, Rodriguez LA.
    J Basic Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 39(5-6):373-6. PubMed ID: 10629974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Comparison of Micro-ID, API 20 E and a conventional technique for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Gregersen T, Persson B, Jensen MM.
    Nord Vet Med; 1980 May; 32(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 6992099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Usefulness of the diagnostic kit Enteroplast for identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Zaremba M, Fiedoruk J, Borowski J.
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1989 May; 41(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 2668658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Biochemical characterization of haemophilus-strains by using the API 20 E- and API 50e-testsystem (author's transl)].
    Holländer R.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1981 Sep; 250(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 7029968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of Micro-ID, a modified Minitek system, and conventional methods for four-hour identification of Enterobacteriacae directly from blood cultures.
    Wellstood S.
    Am J Med Technol; 1982 Sep; 48(9):769-73. PubMed ID: 6753582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Experiences with the API 20A system in routine species identification of anaerobes (author's transl)].
    Essers L, Haralambie E.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1977 Jul; 238(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 333828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.
    Edberg SC, Atkinson B, Chambers C, Moore MH, Palumbo L, Zorzon CF, Singer JM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 389946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.