These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

175 related items for PubMed ID: 7005034

  • 21. [A study on oxytocin challenge test of the fetus with quantitative tocodynamometry determined by contraction index (author's transl)].
    Sawazumi K.
    Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn; 1981 Jul; 33(7):987-95. PubMed ID: 7304139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Clinical validation of antepartum cardiotocographic tests].
    López Garciá R, Castelazo Morales E, Karchmer S.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1983 May; 51(313):121-30. PubMed ID: 6398783
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Cardiotocographic criteria for the fetus at risk].
    Bruchác D.
    Cesk Gynekol; 1980 Jun; 45(5):354-6. PubMed ID: 7397846
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. IV. The nonstress test as a primary approach.
    Keegan KA, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jan 01; 136(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 6444346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Antenatal cardiotocography. Methods, interpretation and clinical application.
    Solum T.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1980 Jan 01; 96():1-31. PubMed ID: 7006306
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Computer assessed fetal heart rate patterns and fetal scalp pH. A preliminary study.
    Lowensohn RI, Yeh SY, Forsythe A, Hon EH.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug 01; 46(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 239371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Routine use of ultrasound and cardiotocography in the intensive surveillance of pregnancies at risk].
    Marković A, Vorkapić Z, Dukić M, Stanojević D, Stavrić V, Rajković V, Kisić M, Srbinović P.
    Med Pregl; 1983 Aug 01; 36(7-8):319-21. PubMed ID: 6672581
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
    Platt LD, Eglinton GS, Sipos L, Broussard PM, Paul RH.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr 01; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Cetrulo CL, Freeman R.
    Obstet Gynecol Annu; 1978 Apr 01; 7():125-34. PubMed ID: 662214
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The measurement of fetal systolic time intervals: lessons from ultrasound.
    Fleming JE, Raymond SP, Smith GC, Whitfield CR.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1986 Dec 01; 23(5-6):289-94. PubMed ID: 3542621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies.
    Cederlind CJ.
    J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb 01; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Antepartum stress test monitoring.
    Garite TJ, Freeman RK.
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Aug 01; 6(2):295-307. PubMed ID: 498681
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.