These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

150 related items for PubMed ID: 7011492

  • 1. [Effect of the type of cement on retention of root posts].
    Francois M.
    Cah Prothese; 1980 Apr; 8(30):79-90. PubMed ID: 7011492
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The luting efficacy of cements in bonding dowels of different metals.
    Nasr HH, Eskander ME, Zaki AM.
    Egypt Dent J; 1987 Apr; 33(2):155-71. PubMed ID: 3304973
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Retention of cast posts relative to cement selection.
    Young HM, Shen C, Maryniuk GA.
    Quintessence Int; 1985 May; 16(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 3898190
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [The influence of dowel design and luting cement on retention and stress distribution in teeth].
    Siemers BS, Peters MC.
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1988 Oct; 95(10):364-8. PubMed ID: 3077792
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Comparative study of the retentive strength of 6 root posts].
    Charpentier J.
    Cah Prothese; 1983 Sep; 11(43):29-38. PubMed ID: 6380661
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P, Sohn J, Ozcan M, Nergiz I.
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [(Experimental study of the retention of cylindrical and conical root posts)].
    Dubruille JH, Meng B.
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1976 Mar; (113):9-64. PubMed ID: 782180
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Retention of prefabricated posts by cements and resins.
    Chapman KW, Worley JL, von Fraunhofer JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Nov; 54(5):649-52. PubMed ID: 3903134
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The retentive effects of pre-fabricated posts by luting cements.
    Sen D, Poyrazoglu E, Tuncelli B.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):585-9. PubMed ID: 15189317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of two root canal sealers on the retentive strength of glass fibre endodontic posts.
    Davis ST, O'Connell BC.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 34(6):468-73. PubMed ID: 17518983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.